Smart Beds Helped Them Sleep on a Cloud. Then the Cloud Crashed
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
nytimes.comTechstory
skepticalnegative
Debate
40/100
IOTCloud ComputingSmart Home
Key topics
IOT
Cloud Computing
Smart Home
A NYT article reports on smart bed owners experiencing disruptions due to an Amazon AWS outage, sparking discussion on the reliability of IoT devices and cloud dependence.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
2h
Peak period
9
2-4h
Avg / period
2.6
Comment distribution13 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 13 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 26, 2025 at 2:57 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 26, 2025 at 5:02 PM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
9 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 27, 2025 at 7:58 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45714324Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 1:26:54 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I appreciate the drifting semantics of names, but Wi-Fi and AWS are really not the same thing.
My cynical take has always been that this is their justification for charging a subscription fee for features that shouldn't require one (e.g. an alarm clock or the ability to change the temperature on a schedule).
There are a couple of open-source projects around jailbreaking it:
- Probably the original attempt: https://github.com/bobobo1618/ninesleep
- The much more polished and usable application built from that starting point: https://github.com/throwaway31265/free-sleep
The latter is even able to do the signal processing needed for heart rate on-device.
We work in the neurotech/sleeptech space (https://affectablesleep.com) and have a subscription service as well. We know when your subscription runs out, and have built the device to run completely offline, and even have a buffer of days if it can't connect to check you have a valid subscription.
Say what you will about subscription services, but being actively hostile to your user base because the device can't connect to a service on one night, seems like very poor planning.
I actually quite look up to 8Sleep as one of the better companies in this space, so I'm surprised this happened to them.
Interesting. So if your product cannot connect to the cloud/subscription, but still works, why is there an issue with it working fully locally?
I don't think we have an issue, 8Sleep had an issue.
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45658056
And update: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45677351