Silver Trades to $50 an Ounce
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
investinglive.comOtherstory
excitedmixed
Debate
70/100
Silver PriceCommodity MarketInvestment
Key topics
Silver Price
Commodity Market
Investment
Silver has reached a record high of $50 an ounce, sparking discussions about market trends, investment strategies, and the potential for further price increases.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
51m
Peak period
62
0-2h
Avg / period
14
Comment distribution84 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 84 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 9, 2025 at 10:24 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 9, 2025 at 11:15 AM EDT
51m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
62 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 10, 2025 at 4:49 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45528141Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 6:36:47 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
both
Globally faith in the USD is being lost, and anyone paying attention knows one of Trump's main economic goals is to weaken the dollar. He also clearly wants to tamper with the fed and economic data, which just ads fuel to the fire.
Meanwhile there isn't really a solid alternate to the dollar, so precious metals are default.
But I think that the answer is "pricing in". When there's a month of inflation after 15 years of none, you price in a one-month blip of inflation. When you look at a year or two of inflation, plus the deficit with no end in sight, you price in inflation forever. Those lead to two very different prices.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US
[ ]
Advent of FATCA means it's hell for normal Americans to bank overseas.
You're basically locking yourself into a tiny box by carrying tradfi products. Most lower middle class people will never notice because if you do things like "receve paycheck, go to grocery store" then you'll never see all the walls built around you. But people with money notice.
> But people with money notice.
skill issue.
you need more money.
Reminds me of Elon Musk recently complaining about how hard it is to be a billionaire.
Gold and silver are at record levels because of capital fleeing fiat due to lack of confidence in central banks -- Trump is actively attacking the US Fed trying to destroy Fed independence. Because the dollar is the world’s funding and invoicing currency, big moves by the Fed reset global financial conditions—pushing other central banks to react even when their domestic cycles don’t match.
Real estate has stalled, hiring has stalled, car buying has stalled (so much unsold inventory dealers can't afford floor plan!). Farmers are getting a $10-$15B bailout / hush money. It's just a matter of time until the correction occurs.
The spike in equities is also based on the assumption that the equities will weather the inflation and still end up as a store of value, but I think that's naive.
Take TSLA, currently "winning" in the special olympics micro-market of the tariff-protected US EV market, and losing internationally -- Musk just did a $1B buyback to juice the price. Take NVIDIA, finally going to get real competition from AMD but spiking after US "deals" juiced the price. Chinese GPUs are 12 months behind and rapidly closing the gap and will be half the price per perf/watt (TSLA investors pretend Chinese EVs don't exist, but not for long).
Imagine 30-120 days out once the national guard is occupying and helping ICE detain more and more of the workforce in the most economically productive 90% of the country!
The US economy is facing the greatest coordinated sabotage it has ever faced and as soon as the real numbers come in things are going to get very very ugly. The country seems to have forgotten that central planning does not work.
That may be part of it. But another part is the US deficit. There is no way that's sustainable. The Fed can't fix it; Congress has to. And do you see any reason to hope that Congress will?
The problem is not congress itself but the peoples' lack of desire to hold members of congress accountable...
https://www.gurufocus.com/economic_indicators/4534/inflation...
The one thing that baffles me is energy prices. We haven't seen this oil/gold ratio since the pandemic, when demand for oil plummeted.
butchered quote: 99 buyers, 100 sellers: price goes down, 101 buyers, 100 sellers: price goes up.
GDP is no longer tied to fuel consumption. You can't fight near-free "fuel" and near-zero opex, the renewables slice is only going to increase. I wouldn't trust any metric or rule of thumb tied to coal/oil/gas prices any longer.
also, manufacturing and shipping just fell off a cliff.
The only exception is the stock market but I believe there’s a lot of literature that if you remove the AI stocks from that there isn’t much S&P growth either.
Additionally with the dollar dropping over 10% the stock market real increase isn’t as high as it appears either.
https://www.wsj.com/finance/investing/gold-screams-debasemen...
(Sorry, archive.ph not responding)
Gold prices are rising sharply, suggesting investor concern about currency debasement through inflation, while the bond market forecasts long-run inflation will remain near the Federal Reserve's target. This discrepancy is likely driven by separate narratives, with gold potentially fueled more by central bank diversification and speculative buying than a pure "debasement trade"
Key Themes & Arguments:
I've been told though that it's a meme stock market these days. I don't believe that though — there are people trading billions of dollars in this machine. Perhaps they're waiting for the music stop and hoping they're not the last to grab a chair.
Massive gilded-age-levels of wealth inequality that will be politically impossible to address (neither US political party has a unified will to do it due to donor capture, and only the one with less will to do it has any national power currently) until there is a substantial economic crash.
We've had an unprecedentedly long period of growth that a lot of the younger "investors" have known nothing but. So this will be their first real bubble burst.
My little brother-in-law is only 27, he was too young to really remember 2007-10, and he started gable-vesting during lockdown, and when you turn $10 into $120 on some meme stock, you feel like you are up, even though the 50 other bets lost money.
Basically when enough people know nothing other than "stonks go up" and "apes strong together" you can keep pumping, but eventually the dump comes for all of us.
I suspect this is just The Cycle. The one that has happened time and time again in the last 100+ years.
Gold is totally irrational if you think you'll have the reigns of the country, since you will always win having land and factories under that scenario.
It signals the rich think they're losing control.
Conclude from that what you will. Personally the cost to keep myself alive relative to the amount I'm making is more interesting than shiny metals.
And contrary to the typical gold bug narrative, it's not because central banks are conjuring new money out of thin air.
The denominator is also decreasing (value of USD).
Fun times.
I suppose lesson learned?
My kids bought silver recently and are up 17% in about 2 months.
Precious metals (silver, gold, platinum, palladium) have out-paced Bitcoin.
USD:EUR hasn't gotten worse than 5-year lows, same with USD:GBP.
I don't think these statistics support "money is fleeing the U.S." or "tariffs are causing runaway inflation", unless I'm missing something? You could paint it as "wealthy people are hedging against globalized recession / future break-downs in trade", maybe, but then why are precious metals out-performing bitcoin?
If anything this feels like "momentum"-driven speculation, similar to what we're seeing with some of the biggest companies in the S&P500, and similar to what we saw in late-2020, where the numbers are front-running a plausible but as-of-yet-unrealized narrative.
What indicators that people are finding useful to make sense of this?
The political fairy tale that is the CPI stays low to avoid having to increase government payments for social security and the like.
What inflation metric, in your opinion, accurately captures those costs?
To clarify, the CPI story is this: we had a period of high-inflation during COVID/the war in Ukraine and our recovery from COVID / reorganization of energy supply chain away from Russia. Now, we're back to normal-pace inflation. Since prices are a one-way ratchet, we're stuck on a new+higher plateau, but we're not still going up at the rate we were in 2021-2022.
Is there an inflation metric that contradicts this narrative?
Today, the county road department still has a "light equipment operator" job and it pays about $52,000 per year. The house they bought 50 years ago is now worth $940k.
There's no way a couple with a single income of a "light equipment operator" could afford that house today.
In fact, even a light equipment operator's boss, the foreman/supervisor couldn't afford that home on today's wages. Maybe a light equipment operator's boss's boss, the a "superintendent of public works" would have enough income to afford the house that 50 years ago a light equipment operator was able to afford.
It really shows how an increasing percentage of the value of a worker's labor has been systematically extracted and transferred from workers to owners.
No political party will ever choose to fiscal prudence when they can just print print print. This is why Bitcoin exists.
It takes between 38 and 39 paper Reserve Notes to equal its value. If Trump isn't removed, I expect it to be 100:1 before the midterms.
Have to imagine someone carrying around a real book of laws (maybe they have Leviticus, or the Code Napoleon, or they've got a nice re-chisel Hammurabi's tablets) - unlike the paper law of today
Dalio explains the currency cycle, which starts with hard currency, goes through some various stages until there's pure fiat, and then goes back to hard currency.
https://people.duke.edu/~charvey/Media/2013/Hurriyet_May_2_2...
> In the era of Emperor Augustus (27 B.C. to 14 A.D.), a Roman centurion was paid 15,000 sestertii. Given that one gold aureus equaled 1,000 sestertii and given there was eight grams of gold in an aureus, the pay comes to 38.58 ounces of gold
Today, 38.58oz of gold would be a salary of $156K/yr.
If we do the same for silver, it comes out to about 470oz of silver. So $23,500/yr.
If we compare that to a US Army E-8 (say 80k/yr), we can argue that gold has doubled its value relative to labor and silver has dropped to almost a quarter.
Interesting approach!
But at 8 grams of gold per aureus, the ~40 troy ounces of gold annual salary is about right.
One aureus is approximately $1000 of gold value. And as a collectible item it is worth $3k-10k.
> In or about 23 BC, with the coinage reform of Augustus, the sestertius was reintroduced as a large brass denomination,
That's 375kg of brass which would fetch about $1700 in today's dollars at scrap prices.
We don't have an asset bubble the prices are just adjusting to the lower dollar.
I bet the FED will have to increase interest rates next year and that's when we'll see a collapse of asset values and since markets tend to over correct, it's going to be painful for all holders. Be ready...
feels pretty relevant again...