Scientists Are Caught in a Political Trap
Key topics
The article discusses how scientists are increasingly caught in a political trap, with their work being politicized, and the discussion highlights the long-standing issue of 'dual-use' technologies and the blurred lines between scientific curiosity and political agendas.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
1
1-2h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 23, 2025 at 10:56 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 24, 2025 at 12:07 AM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 24, 2025 at 3:37 AM EDT
5 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Plenty pretend semiconductors or programming is a non political field where the science and creativity are rewarded, but the truth is both technology are "dual use".
I think programming or people who do a lot of work in cryptography and signals intelligence would know this all to well. What can be seen as scientific or academic curiosity can be seen as a threat to the establishment or a potential tool that the MIC can use.
Hell part of the reason semiconductors have come so far is due to how close they tie into defense and intelligence.
The government has long created rules it imposed on researchers such as the export restrictions on pgp, or on DVD keys, or prosecution of security researchers. This is nothing new for those who have been aware of the general trends.
The article is about defending scientific methods and the field as a whole and how that is shifting society to the right, not how scientific research is applied?
Besides that nobody claimed it was "new": What I think is new, unheard of before, that a US president is openly advocating against evidence-based science.