Sbir Mills Are Draining America's Innovation Fund
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
defensescoop.comOtherstory
calmnegative
Debate
20/100
Sbir ProgramInnovation FundingGovernment Contracting
Key topics
Sbir Program
Innovation Funding
Government Contracting
The article discusses how 'SBIR Mills' are draining America's innovation fund, and commenters share their experiences with the SBIR program, highlighting its limitations and challenges.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
3h
Peak period
2
3-4h
Avg / period
2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 8, 2025 at 7:23 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 8, 2025 at 10:30 PM EDT
3h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 3-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 8, 2025 at 11:04 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45175431Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:06:31 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
A big factor, however, is that much the tech NASA needs to develop for space applications has no commercial viability outside of NASA. We're the only potential buyer. And since it wasn't directly motivated by a specific NASA program and funded by a NASA project dollars, it has little chance to continue development once the SBIR contract ends. For many technologies, SBIR funding is the only fundamental tech development funding they get at all.
How can a private company develop a technology only the government needs when the funding from the government is extremely irregular, inconsistent, and insufficient?
I guess they could have a bunch of irons in the fire so they have a decent shot of getting some funding for anything they can do to stay in business. Maybe some of them eventually turn into SBIR mills.
And SBIR mills have been around forever. They usually have the inside track by writing the requirements (as white papers) for COTR's that then end up in the book a year later--sometimes without changing a word!