Satellites Reveal Heat Leaking From Largest Us Cryptocurrency Mining Center
Key topics
As satellites expose the massive heat leakage from the largest US cryptocurrency mining center, commenters are weighing in on the potential for repurposing this wasted energy. Some, like userbinator, ponder whether the heat could be harnessed for district heating, while others, such as adonovan and duskwuff, point out the practical limitations, including the relatively low temperature of the waste heat and the lack of demand for it in the surrounding small town. The discussion also touches on the inherent inefficiency of cryptocurrency mining, with timeon and edoceo noting that it's "by design," while others, like dangalf and geoffschmidt, debate whether the heat is truly "waste" or simply a byproduct of the electricity used for computations. The conversation highlights the complex interplay between energy consumption, waste, and the design of cryptocurrency mining operations.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
33m
Peak period
76
0-6h
Avg / period
20
Based on 160 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 22, 2025 at 6:23 PM EST
14 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 22, 2025 at 6:56 PM EST
33m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
76 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 25, 2025 at 11:08 AM EST
11 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
For example, kinda wasteful to cook eggs with new electrons when you could use the computer heat to help you denature those proteins. Or just put the heat in human living spaces.
(Putting aside how practical that actually is... Which it isn't)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9sh9NpL4i8
https://mindmatters.ai/2020/10/researchers-the-aliens-exist-...
https://aleph.se/andart2/space/the-aestivation-hypothesis-po...
And it only cost 0.006 rain forests!
If you pull 100W of power out of an electric socket, you are heating your environment at 100W of power completely independent of what you use that electricity for.
And that’s ignoring that sound and photon emissions typically hit a wall or other physical surface and get converted to heat.
The energy of the universe is a pool of water a top a cliff. Water running off this cliff is used to do stuff (work), and the pool at the bottom is heat.
The "heat death of the universe" is referring this water fall running dry, and all the energy being in this useless pool of "heat".
Is it impossible to convert heat into other forms of energy without "consuming" materials like in the case of steam, geothermal or even the ones that need a cold body to utilize thermoelectric effect.
On a related note, when there's talk about dyson spheres, and detecting them via infrared waste heat, I also don't understand that. An alien civilization is capable of building massive space structures but then let waste heat just pour out into the universe in such insane quantities that we could see it tens/hundreds of light years away? What a waste. Why wouldn't they recover that heat and make use of it instead? And repeat until the waste is too small to bother recovering, at which point we would no longer be able to detect it.
There is no way to get rid of heat. It has to go somewhere; otherwise, the temperature of the system will increase without bound.
Or if you magically beam 100% of the captured energy somewhere else, now that place gets to deal with shedding the heat from however many 1e26W+ of power were consumed. God help the poor planet you aim that ray of death at.
There is no other alternative! If I build a perfect Dyson sphere and capture the energy output of a star, all of that energy will become heat. The average surface temperature of my Dyson sphere will be (IIRC) the ratio of the surface area of the sphere to that of the contained star, multiplied by the star's effective surface temperature.
"Recovering heat and making use of it" requires a heat differential. You need a cold side and a hot side to use energy. Using that energy causes the cold side to heat and the hot side to cool, until they reach equilibrium. The further the difference, the more usable work you can do. The closer the two sides are, the less work you can do.
Someone else here said it best: waste heat is the graveyard of energy. Once you have used energy, it will become high-entropy, low-grade, diffuse heat which is difficult-to-impossible to extract further work from.
"British reversible computing startup Vaire has demonstrated an adiabatic reversible computing system with net energy recovery"
https://www.eetimes.com/vaire-demos-energy-recovery-with-rev...
https://vaire.co/
Short introduction video to reversible computing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVmZTGeIwnc
Thanks for posting. Pretty cool.
Yes it ends up as heat, but with some forethought, it could be used to eg heat people's homes rather than waste.
https://terahash.space/en/
After removing power even that small amount ends up as heat through friction ( both in the bearing but mostly in the air turbulence).
So it is correct that a 100% "end up" as heat
We do know what that air does eventually. It swirls around generating friction, raising its temperature (heat!) and gradually slowing down
Certain chemical reaction endotermic reaction require energy to start. This energy is absorbed to generate molecular bond.
Also in the generation and absorption of high energy radiation there are non-thermal processes that can transfer energy.
Even something like bending a metal bar is not 100% a thermal process.
I say "ordinary computers" because other comments mentioned "reversible computers" for which this limit doesn't apply.
According to the linked wikipedia page, this theoretical limit is around a billion times smaller than current computers use for an operation, so you may call me pedantic.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle
It's that computation requires electricity. And almost all of the heat in bitcoin mining comes from computation, technically changing transistor state.
It would be wonderful if we could capture that waste heat and give it a useful purpose, like heating homes, or perhaps even generating new electricity.
(And this is before getting into the fact that I believe mining cryptocurrency is a wasteful use of electricity in the first place.)
Even if turned into useful work, the end result of that work is still ultimately heat.
Computational results do not contain stored potential energy. There is no such thing as energy being "used up" doing computation such that it doesn't end as waste heat.
We can generate less heat per computation but it eventually cannot be avoided.
I guess, if it's using fossil fuel to generate power it's also just moving heat from one place to another, but really really slowly. The relevant factor there is that the long term storage was performing a important secondary function of holding a lot of co2.
It's in Texas, surely that's an area amenable to solar production. What are they actually using there.
Edit: One steel foundry uses about 3,000 more than that, according to my napkin math
Is this a daily usage thing? I test based on my home usage and the numbers seem way out. I use about 25kWh per day.
I have a smaller house, we use about 13kwH per day. 4kw highest spike during the day.
Your usage is very low. Do you use electricity for water heating and cooking? If so, that’s impressive.
We do, and charge a car.
One electric car but its on a separate meter unlimited charging for $40/mo.
We really don't do too much around the house. Three people. One TV running maybe two sometimes. Two desktops (well one laptop with a dock). A random PC as a server. Everything electric (oven, range, water, etc) besides furnace. Random lights (all LED, hue). A heater here or there.
I recently bought a bunch of (used) solar panels and was doing our load calculations for peak draw and selecting battery size.
With solar we are making a ton more power than we are using at the moment, it’s a sunny summer and we are managing to export something like 8x the power we are drawing from the grid.
I recently bought 30 600w panels that were used, apparently they used to be on a GM parking lot canopy but got uninstalled during covid lockdown and were in storage for ~4 years. I got a great price and I've tested ~30% and they are all in spec.
We pay ~$0.23 per kwh all in (supply, distribution, etc). Our provider (DTE) only pays ~$0.08 per kwh we supply, and its a credit and maxed out at our bill. So if we spend $200 on energy, we can only get $200 off. Which does mean free electricity, but also means no profit.
Last month it was 7. And we’re in the winter. Over the summer is more like 5.
So it's a useful figure if you want to make a shocking headline. "Uses as much power as infinity of something that uses no power!"
As in, we have now have the energy capacity for 300,000 fewer homes given this operating data center.
So not only is it a relatable unit, but it's an incredibly meaningful unit for those who care about ensuring that energy availability actually support something of value (families) rather than something wasteful (crypto mining).
Folks should be happy since the crypto operation is using far less power and dumping less heat into the environment that the industrial operation that was previously there, but datacenters seem to be a trendy thing complain about at the moment so here we are.
It remains to be seen if AI will end up being about as useful as crypto in the long run.
It's burning less power than before, but it's not producing anything of value.
The world cannot reasonbly run without alu, it got along better without crypto currencies.
I remember the local press going on about the crypto mining operation and how folks were going get high-tech jobs in this rural area of Texas. Of course it didn't go that way.
Aluminum smelting is an incredibly energy intensive operation. A lot of places in the US that used to host aluminum smelters now host large datacenters, include the Google data center in The Dalles, Oregon on the Columbia river near a hydro dam. It's a shame that Rockdale didn't get something useful like these other places.
As far as Al smelting in the US; I don't know. I'd imagine it produces a lot of air pollution by itself and uses huge amounts of power that is usually generated by cheap methods like burning rocks (coal) or large hydro operations nearby to minimize transmission costs. Then you gotta get ore to the site. The only Al smelter I recall being left in the US is up near Puget Sound in Bellingham, WA and I think it's currently shutdown.
Relatively speaking, bauxite is practically worthless. But mix it in with a few gigawatt hours and you get out a fairly valuable commodity.
It would be cool if all this residual heat could be concentrated to smelt aluminum!
Aluminum is useful.
Arc furnace foundry : 500 kw/tonne
Production : 150 t/hr
500*150 = 75 MW/h
Estimated energy production from all combustion and nuclear from the industrial revolution onwards, assumed that heat was dumped into the atmosphere evenly at once, calculate temperature rise based on atmosphere makeup. Ignores the impact of some of that heat getting sinked into the ground and ocean, and the increased thermal radiation out to space over that period. In general, heat flows from the ground and ocean into the atmosphere instead of the other way around, and the rise in thermal radiation isn't that large.
On the other hand, this isn't something that the smart professionals ever talk about when discussing climate change, so I'm sure that the napkin math working out so close to explaining the whole effect has to be missing something.
We use ~20 TW, while solar radiation is ~500 PW and just the heating from global warming alone is 460TW (that is, how much heat is being accumulated as increased Earth temperature).
The amount of heat rejected to the atmosphere from electronic devices is negligible.
Humans produce about 20TW globally at this time (ChatGPT), while the sun adds about 174000TW of energy to the earth.
I guess you could argue that our waste heat does something, but I think the greenhouse gases that trap this enormous energy more effectively have a far bigger effect.
We use a fraction of the sun’s total energy output each year, orders of magnitude more energy are in sunlight radiating onto the Earth than in the heat rejected from buildings with air conditioning.
Oh let’s look at what the humans are up to with their climate change problem. Oh wow they’ve got giant data centers at work on the problem. I guess maybe it’s worth the extra heat. Let’s see what they’re calculati— nope they’re just collecting and trading numbers.
I also think we are pretty dumb. But what reference point makes you think we are either smarter or dumber than other spacefaring species
Us being the dumbest spacefaring species does not necessarily imply the existence of spacefaring species other than us.
We’re not a species that will likely ever reach singularity. We operate in packs and if we don’t have a pack we’re loyal to then it’s every man for themselves.
Why does this even exist?
And yes, I get what mining is and I get what the blockchain does. I’m saying that proof of work is absurd.
Welcome to our cashless society. It’s naive to think no one would fight back.
It may have devolved to useless speculation and gambling for now, but the genie cannot be put back into the bottle very easily at this point.
What does "That would just make miners move" mean to you?
You want to read about "conservation of etendue" for a technical explanation. For an easier explanation, look for xkcd's excellent "Fire from Moonlight".
That's how they call Area 51 now ?
So it would be more environmentally friendly to drive an ICE vehicle from Charolette NC to Miami and back to drop off some cash, than to send a payment via btc?
That seems crazy
1 more comments available on Hacker News