Running Multiple AI Agents for Planning and Reviews: What's Your Approach?
Key topics
I’ve been experimenting with coding agents for about a year. I paid for Cursor and liked it until I hit the monthly limit, then tried Claude Code and now use it most. I also keep a ChatGPT subscription because I created a couple of Custom GPTs that others still use. Codex is now part of the ChatGPT plan, and Gemini CLI provides 1,000 free requests per day.
I suspect I’m not getting full value from all these tools.
How do you handle multiple providers?
I use them for brainstorming and switching personas. For planning, I ask Claude Code to spawn subagents (Gemini, Codex, Cursor). I run other coding CLIs via Roundtable MCP https://github.com/askbudi/roundtable/ , assign each one planning tasks, and then merge their plans. For landing pages, I send subagents to critique and iterate. The mix of models and system prompts helps me see more angles.
Curious to hear how you use them.
The author shares their experience using multiple AI coding tools and agents for planning and reviews, and asks the community for their approaches, sparking a discussion on how to effectively utilize these tools.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
No activity data yet
We're still syncing comments from Hacker News.
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Discussion hasn't started yet.