Review of Medical Cannabis Use Finds Little Evidence of Benefit

Terrible article, repeatedly ignoring patients' lived experience.

> a gulf between how the public perceives cannabis and what gold-standard science shows

> The evidence does not support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids at this point for most of the indications that folks are using it for

> Pain is a leading reason people use medical cannabis, but the review found no evidence to indicate that cannabis could ease acute pain

> cannabis is classified federally along with heroin and LSD as having no medical purpose and a high propensity for misuse

cannabis in many varieties and cannabinoids especially the most significant naturally made potentially aboundant and so theoretically cheaply sourceable receptors' agonist compound, namely delta-9-thc, when taken not occasionally i.e. within a continuous pattern of increasingly large quantities, in order to steadily reach without having to rise a too harsh steep slope, to plateau when the desired medical effect could manifest, in extracted purified forms, at high molar concentrations (up to and over 5-10 µM depending on different malignancies) have demostrated - albeit not in many clinical settings despite numerous studies dating back since 1974 and even more so in the last recent decades, have confirmed such potential usage - a strong antiproliferative, antineoplastic, antitumor, anticancer activity.

As a non user, I would observe they didn't say no effects, it depends. If it didn't work for PTSD with vets (as one example) it did have measurable benefits for anxiety with non PTSD patients.

And, pharmaceutical grade, non (or less) psychoactive doses did work for appetite, nausea and paediatric fitting.

The problem is the vast bulk of non pharmaceutical, cannabis dispensary use, which appear to have a remarkably low bar to be dispensed.