Replit Defaults Public Projects to Mit–hidden IP Risks Explained
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
vasiletiple.substack.comTechstory
calmnegative
Debate
10/100
ReplitMit LicenseIntellectual Property
Key topics
Replit
Mit License
Intellectual Property
The author examines Replit's default MIT license for public projects and highlights potential hidden IP risks, sparking a discussion on the implications of such a default setting.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 26, 2025 at 4:22 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 26, 2025 at 4:23 AM EDT
1m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 26, 2025 at 4:23 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Discussion (1 comments)
Showing 1 comments
usernamevasileAuthor
3 months ago
This breaks down Replit’s default MIT license, how non-code assets can create IP confusion, and steps founders can take. Feedback welcome—interested in how others handle licensing on no-code platforms.
View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45384113Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 1:16:13 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.