Quanta to Publish Popular Math and Physics Books by Terence Tao and David Tong
Key topics
The announcement of Quanta's new book series, featuring renowned mathematicians and physicists like Terence Tao and David Tong, sparked a lively discussion about popular science writing, veering off into a nostalgic debate about the merits and flaws of science authors like Isaac Asimov. Commenters shared their fond memories of Asimov's non-fiction works, while others pointed out his casual misogyny, with some defending their own lack of awareness of this issue. The conversation also bounced to other science writers, like George Gamow, with commenters recommending his books and sharing their favorites. Amidst the discussion, a surprising amount of passion and personal anecdotes surfaced, highlighting the lasting impact of these science writers on their readers.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
42m
Peak period
11
0-2h
Avg / period
5.8
Based on 35 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 8, 2025 at 12:39 PM EST
26 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 8, 2025 at 1:21 PM EST
42m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
11 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 9, 2025 at 10:56 AM EST
25 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
For the current generation I never miss a chance to mention Gamow's non-fiction.
It's unfortunate that works of great non-fiction writers gradually evaporate away from our cultural consciousness after the authors die.
It makes me sad to know there will be a generation, or maybe it's already here, one that has not delighted in Martin Gardner.
I am the same, though frustratingly he still somehow managed to weave his casual misogyny into even his non-fiction works.
But maybe it's just because I started reading his works long after their initial release. In particular, I was quite surprised to later learn that "Asimov's New Guide to Science" was originally published as "The Intelligent Man's Guide to Science".
>...The book's title was Svirsky's, chosen as a deliberate homage to George Bernard Shaw's The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism (1928). Asimov feared the title would be seen as elitist and condescending, and he suggested Everyone's Guide to Science as an alternative, but Svirsky refused. Years later, when he was confronted by annoyed feminists who asked why the book was restricted to men, Asimov would claim that the "intelligent man" of the title referred to himself;[3] thus anticipating the title Asimov's Guide to Science adopted for the third edition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligent_Man%27s_Guide_...
Is this your immature way of asking for an example of what I am addressing in my comment?
I’m willing to believe it, but I didn’t notice any in the time I was reading his fiction.
In The Building Blocks Of The Universe's section on Calcium:
> Another way of getting round the problem of hard water is to manufacture compounds that behave like soap but don't form insoluble compounds with calcium. Many types of such detergents have been put on the market in the last ten years, and hard water is far less of a problem for the housewife than it used to be.
Reads like '90s era comedy, ala "women be cleaning, amirite?", without even the lazy backdoor of "its just a joke".
That's because he was only the second-best sci-fi writer but the best science writer in the world at the time [Clarke-Asimov Treaty of Park Avenue|https://sfandfantasy.co.uk/php/the-big-3.php]
I did not know about this. Arthur C Clarke was indeed my favourite at that time (even now).
Asimov, however, killed it with his two goosebump-good shorts, Nightfall and Last Question.
Stop what you’re doing and read The Star.
That's a bit of an overstatement? There's Confucius, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, ... Darwin, Newton, Einstein, ... Jefferson, Decartes, .... (you get the idea).
It is a competitive field; what's sufficient to win attention in the current generation is often not enough for future generations, which have their own contemporary writers.
If you haven’t tried it already I highly recommend Hacker News.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNVQfWC_evg
Everything Is Fields By David Tong (Early 2027)
Six Math Essentials By Terence Tao (November 2026)
The Proof in the Code By Kevin Hartnett (June 2026, Preorder Available)
[0] https://www.quantabooks.org/
For a historic overview of mathematics with (accessible) formulas I highly recommend “Journey through genius: The great theorems of mathematics”.