Promptpwnd: Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Github Actions Using AI Agents
Posted29 days agoActive29 days ago
aikido.devSecuritystory
informativeneutral
Debate
40/100
Github ActionsAI SecurityNpm Vulnerabilities
Key topics
Github Actions
AI Security
Npm Vulnerabilities
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
19m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 5, 2025 at 12:57 AM EST
29 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 5, 2025 at 1:16 AM EST
19m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 5, 2025 at 1:16 AM EST
29 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 46157229Type: storyLast synced: 12/5/2025, 6:20:10 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The attack surface is interesting - the agent's "prompt" becomes a trust boundary, and anything that can influence that prompt (PR descriptions, issue comments, commit messages) becomes a potential attack vector.
I've been working on browser automation agents and the same principle applies - you have to assume any page content or user input could be adversarial. Strict separation between "what the agent can see" and "what the agent can do" is crucial.