'prebunking' False Claims Can Increase Public Trust in Elections
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
phys.orgResearchstory
calmpositive
Debate
10/100
Election IntegrityMisinformationPrebunking
Key topics
Election Integrity
Misinformation
Prebunking
Research suggests that 'prebunking' false claims can increase public trust in elections by inoculating people against misinformation.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
1
1-2h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 17, 2025 at 5:20 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 17, 2025 at 6:47 AM EDT
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 17, 2025 at 6:47 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45273590Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 4:02:28 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
"Sometimes Less Is More: Censorship, News Falsification, and Disapproval in 1989 East Germany"
>Does more media censorship imply more regime stability? We argue that censorship may cause mass disapproval for censoring regimes. In particular, we expect that censorship backfires when citizens can falsify media content through alternative sources of information. We empirically test our theoretical argument in an autocratic regime—the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Results demonstrate how exposed state censorship on the country's emigration crisis fueled outrage in the weeks before the 1989 revolution. Combining original weekly approval surveys on GDR state television and daily content data of West German news programs with a quasi-experimental research design, we show that recipients disapproved of censorship if they were able to detect misinformation through conflicting reports on Western television. Our findings have important implications for the study of censoring systems in contemporary autocracies, external democracy promotion, and campaigns aimed at undermining trust in traditional journalism.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12501