Power-Over-Skin: Full-Body Wearables Powered by Intra-Body Rf Energy (2024)
Posted3 months agoActive2 months ago
dl.acm.orgResearchstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
Wearable TechnologyRf Energy HarvestingBiomedical Engineering
Key topics
Wearable Technology
Rf Energy Harvesting
Biomedical Engineering
Researchers present 'Power-over-Skin,' a technology that enables full-body wearables to be powered by intra-body RF energy, sparking discussion on its potential applications, safety, and feasibility.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
13
84-90h
Avg / period
7.5
Comment distribution15 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 15 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 19, 2025 at 8:56 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 23, 2025 at 8:24 AM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
13 comments in 84-90h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 23, 2025 at 11:51 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45639338Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 1:42:01 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://www.livescience.com/60599-electricity-generated-from...
Garmin already has solar on many watches to extend battery and the Kinefox is already doing kinetic on animal tracking
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure/image?downl...
For motion: The "standard" calorific demands of a human work out as about 100-120 watts or so; adding some mechanism that extracts energy from your motion, makes your motion harder by that plus whatever gets lost as heat (which can't be extracted efficiently). Something that makes you burn an extra 500 kcal/day would at best be 24 watts, but whatever it was it would basically have to put continuous resistance on some of your movement to get that, like an exoskeleton but it doesn't assist you it just slows you down the whole time.
Now, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think human biological efficiency is around 25%? So that 500 kcal/day -> 24 watts actually looks like (6 watts of mechanical output + 18 watts of heat)?
And those 18… the theoretical maximum efficiency depends on the difference between the hot side and the cold side, so to be as efficient as possible you'd need to be somewhere cold. The Carnot efficiency limit is η = 1 - T_cold/T_hot (absolute temperature, i.e. in Kelvin), so human body temperature of 310 K (37°C), somewhere really cold 253 K (-20°C) -> 1 - 253/310 = 0.184 (18%), which gets you 3.3 W from an extremely unpleasant experience.
Even the full 24 W is about what you'd get from a T-shirt made from the best solar cells with a reasonable assumption about capacity factor.
The only places I'm aware of where wind beats muscle, is inside a hurricane or a tornado. And that's if you could harvest it on a size scale comparable to your body.
> Garmin already has solar on many watches to extend battery and the Kinefox is already doing kinetic on animal tracking
Some of the mechanical watches when I was a kid were advertised as keeping themselves wound from body motion. Apparently those predate my birth by over two centuries.
My school calculator back in 1995 was already solar powered, too.
Neither of these uses are power-hungry.