Please Donate to Keep Network Time Protocol Up – Goal 1k
Key topics
The Network Time Protocol (NTP) project is seeking donations to continue its operations, sparking a discussion on the funding of critical open-source infrastructure and the responsibility of large corporations that rely on it.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
3h
Peak period
95
0-6h
Avg / period
22.9
Based on 160 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 12, 2025 at 2:56 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 12, 2025 at 5:53 AM EST
3h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
95 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 14, 2025 at 12:57 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Research is put front and centre in their pitch for funding.
And given that ntp.org runs servers that so many organizations use they should be near the top of the funding queue for any NTP research. My 2c.
I too would be interested in knowing what the Network Time Foundation is researching, and I think conversation about that is appropriate here. NTP certainly _seems_ like it’s been ‘good enough’ for decades to an uninformed observer, and discussing if and why it’s not would be interesting (and perhaps motivate donations!)
Really? The sentence at the top of the Donate page seems pretty clear to me:
> Your donation helps Network Time Foundation maintain the NTP website and provide resources and support to NTP developers.
Is it unclear to you?
https://gist.github.com/mutin-sa/eea1c396b1e610a2da1e5550d94...
But..it's $1k. This is basically pocket change on an institutional level. I've been part of some very scrappy and poorly funded community organizations and even they took in more than $1k every year. Even if you don't believe NTP maintainers should be paid anything for their work (an opinion I don't hold), it's trivial to spend this amount on modest everyday expenses like renting a venue a couple of times, buying insurance, and paying for hosting and technical resources.
EDIT: Here is their 2024 tax return
https://www.nwtime.org/about/documents/2024_NTF_IRS_990.pdf
It looks like they took in more than $200k and spent $100k on "contract services" (I can't tell what that means) and somewhat modest amounts on other things. Unfortunately I need to exit the rabbit hole now.
I can't imagine its much more than that if we are talking about such a small sum.
How much more clear can they reasonably be?
It seems a big waste of effort to maintain -say- a damnable Trello board with upcoming priorities and roadmaps <strike>and Kickstarter stretch goals</strike> when their bug tracker and mailing list are visible to the public. (Though, it seems that they've recently put the list behind some broken moderation software, so you have to go to -say- the IETF's archive of the thing to read it. "AI" crawlers ruin everything.)
EDIT: Do note that that tax return you found is for the Network Time Foundation, not the NTP Project. I don't know if the two are separate entities for tax purposes, but do note that the NTF supports several projects, of which the NTP Project is one. The NTP Project is just for NTP.
and $1000 seems at the same time to be quite a bit of money, but also too little to be for funding people long term.
Thankfully, that's also on the front page:
What they are doing:
> The NTP Project produces an open source Reference Implementation of the NTP standard, maintains the implementation Documentation, and develops the protocol and algorithmic standard that is used to communicate time between systems
And why it matters:
> NTP is what ensures the reliability of billions of devices around the world, under the sea, and even in space
Now, it doesn't explain why a reference implementation is a good thing, but I think that at this point, you have a good enough idea to decide if you want to donate or not.
Edit: However, $1000 seems too low to matter. It may not even pay for the expense of the fundraising itself. I think it is more of an awareness campaign: "look at the protocol we all use, you would think we are talking many millions of dollars, but the truth is, you are off by orders of magnitude"
But yeah, critical infrastructure usually goes criminally underfunded.
Relatedly: surely you're not of the opinion that the various GPS constellations are not critical infrastructure?
[0] <https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-se...>
You can use the public Google or AWS pools if you want. Note that they have their own software, too, so be sure you understand the differences like leap smearing.
Blocking FAANG IPs from the NTP Foundation’s pools wouldn’t hurt FAANG at all. It would only hurt people who weren’t aware and used the NTP Foundation’s pool for things.
Listen to my last prayer
Hi-ho-silver-o
Deliver me from nowhere
Notably NTPd doesn't support leap-smear, which means those who absolutely must have monotonic time can't use it at all.
... shouldn’t be using a Unix timestamp, or anything else that’s not a count of SI seconds elapsed since a fixed reference point, to begin with.
[1] https://people.csail.mit.edu/rachit/post/you-have-built-a-co..., https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29891428
...rather than setting a rather awful minimum performance spec of 10ppm smearing over a leap second day.
Three lies: Universal - multiple smear implementations, linear vs cosine off the top of my head.
Coordinated - whose in charge here? Google? Facebook?
Time - doesn't even try for 1s/s
UTC is, for all intents and purposes, yet another human readable time zone. And should be treated as such. The underlying hardware problems I have and understand. Don't need the software making it worse.
I am vaguely aware he has some unpopular political beliefs (though exactly what I don't know). Is that it?
Oh, also he doesn't really "contribute" to tech projects so much as "exists near/within them and writes long form ramblings".
If he just "exists near", I see even less of a case why someone should avoid it.
But horses for courses, people can choose to avoid for whatever reason.
It is not even his beliefs, though many of them are — to my ears and hopefully to most — quite repugnant.
It is his attitude, approach, and at various times the kinds of people he attracts.
As it goes, I've seen him speak, back in the 90s, CatB era. He was genial enough but he seemed to have a coterie around him of rather less pleasant people. It could just have been a bad day but it has stuck in my mind ever since: it was the first time I understood that there's not really any sort of inclsive geek community.
ntpsec as a project seems to be doing ok. They are releasing new versions, fix reported issues, accept patches, and develop the code publicly. While ntp still has a huge list of acknowledged but unfixed CVEs.
It should be noted that there currently exists no standard, technical or statutory, for how to do leap smearing. If an event happens and you need to tie your timestamped event logs to the 'greater reality' in some legally binding way there's (AIUI) no way to do that.
A few years ago there was a draft on the idea:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-leap-smear-...
And the currently-draft NTPv5 has something about:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5/
Though the flag simply says that the timescale is smeared and not (AFAICT) how it is being done.
See also perhaps RFC 8633 § 2.7.1:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8633/TAI (Temps Atomique International), is UTC without leap seconds and is the source of truth for "what time is it"
I'm finding conflicting reports of being able to actually use TAI on linux but there are several claims of at least specialty setups existing. You would absolutely not want smearing or anything like that in your time synchronization software in this case.
> 1 error prohibited this submission from being saved:
> Looks like you are not a human
Good to know.
How do you know the cash you are using is not "blood money"? Come on.
You know what else costs money? When someone wants to give you money, and you misidentify them as a bot and refuse their money.
For those who does not handle these things: I am not sure on what processor Network Time Foundation is using, but Stripe's $15 fee is actually on the low side of chargebacks (some processors even use the fixed fee + percentage model). Worse, this is unconditional: if you somehow won this, you won't get the chargeback fee.
have you heard about decentralization?
society is not civilization. local vs global.
I agree, and I am still pointing to the collapse of society, not civilization. My infrastructure is local. If local society collapses, what reason do people have to maintain transmission and distribution lines and electrical substations, to work at power plants, to maintain fiber optic or copper lines for internet connectivity?
Even if "the internet" as a whole is still around, the inability for someone to connect to and to use it means cryptocurrency is similarly useless.
(Edited to add: that was from Safari. Chrome worked. YMMV.)
Too bad that good projects mess their donations up by doing web BS.
The big companies who use NTP have their own pools and either use versions of different ntp implantations or their own internal ones.
All of these comments assuming cloud providers are using the reference NTP implementation and the public pools have no idea what they’re talking about.
And which NTP servers are those pools synchronized to?
It was like a vacation for our heads.
Not sure how, but a yearly "lockdown vacation" would be a Good Thing for our cities (IMNSHO).
Though they could fake it: take the current cleared total and add your amount for your display.
I submitted a request for commercial use via their online form but never received a response.
What I Mean:
Reference .gov atomic clock (not radium one) -> NTP -> ? -> ? -> satellite control station -> gps -> PTP
Hahaha
Is there any reason to believe that PTP would be better in normal networks?
There was a fork to clean up and secure the implementation: https://ntpsec.org and ideally they would combine forces.
Summarized here: https://lwn.net/Articles/713901
Even if it's not, ESR is involved so it's not serious.
But it seems that his nerding, taken by itself, is pretty solid. Is that not the case?
That’s not to say that his open source projects aren’t useful, only that there are thousands of other developers who’ve done work of similar scale and adoption.
Not really, see forex the reposurgeon nonsense. https://www.phoronix.com/news/GCC-Git-Not-Yet-Settled
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45900184
I donated an amount but the bar didn't move and is at the same level($395) as before my donation
I’d like to see more projects do a breakdown of total yearly costs (including contributor compensation!), how much existing sponsorships from companies actually cover, and what number they’d need to operate properly (with full-time, paid contributors).
Of course the same thing happens in reverse (see recent python.org refusal to accept federal funding)
> Is it really necessary for a DEI policy being required to appear…?
So ignoring the, well, ignorance of the remainder of your statement, it’s worth pointing out that these entities already publish mission statements, community/contributor guidelines, and a raft of other documentation that governs how they intend to operate as a way of greasing the wheels of operations. Policies are the norm, not the exception, because they dictate the rules of engagement.
So yeah, I’m all for groups making clear what they do and do not find acceptable. Transparency is a good thing, be it in code (open source), accounting, policy, or governance. And if more groups opened up their books and laid bare their operations, it’d be easier to tie their outcomes to industrial and governmental bad actors (like AWS, Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc) that fail to substantially support these technologies, or demand favors or policy changes in exchange for basic funding.
Ideally? Orgs that use open source tech in their products ought to chip in a fixed percentage to ongoing support of that project. If an entity like AWS chipped in, say, 0.01% of revenue from every service that used NTP, then the NTP organization almost certainly wouldn’t require additional funding.
Let it fail and see what happens.
I’m too poor to have too much revenue that I need to donate some away to pay fewer taxes. That’s a problem corporations have.
I’m sick of having to pay for my own tools to do my job at your company. Either find a way to build using free tools or fork up the license for that Visual Studio Ultimate or IntelliJ Idea Ultimate license. Pay for your database vendor. Your corporate IdP. Why not $300/yr for a high value output employee?
You can choose your tool, you’ll get it.
That's actually decent. Too often you're stuck with whatever gear your shop uses - Bosch, Hilti, Makita are the most common power tools here in Germany. It makes sense for the penny pinchers who purchase on volume and get discounts, but chances are high it ends up pissing off the employees rather sooner than later.
But you absolutely shouldn't have to pay for your own tools. (That said, blue collar people often have to, unlike us, and that's also awful.) But also, it's their productivity. If you are all laboring under the same constraints, it's their choice to make if they care about your productivity.
Agreed. They call that 'open source' work (derogative)
Maybe building the world on open source software was not good idea
> Let it fail and see what happens.
It will get replaced by a proprietary protocol/paid service from each Azure, Cloudflare, Google, AWS, ...
The rest of us will be S.O.L.
NTP might not be able to generate AI cat videos full of hallucinations but it is a vital part of web infrastructure. The same can't be said about today's mega projects.
Are these goals monthly goals, with the counter being reset? The sites don’t make that clear.
75 more comments available on Hacker News