Peter Thiel Essay on the Antichrist, One Piece, and More
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
firstthings.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
Peter ThielChristianityPop Culture
Key topics
Peter Thiel
Christianity
Pop Culture
Peter Thiel's essay explores the intersection of faith and culture, prompting discussion on the implications of his ideas and the connections he draws between Christianity and modern pop culture.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
4m
Peak period
30
0-12h
Avg / period
7.4
Comment distribution37 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 37 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 2, 2025 at 7:36 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 2, 2025 at 7:40 PM EDT
4m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
30 comments in 0-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 7, 2025 at 1:42 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45456875Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 12:38:35 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I know it is Thiel, so are we putting this here as a warning or a veneration?
Seems like we’re way beyond the point of no return on the concept that humanity has consistent needs and that individual freedom should be limited for the good of the larger group
The arbitrary nature of the “larger group” being limited in scope is entirely ethno-socially constructed.
So again wouldn’t the idealized form of this live at the highest level of human coherence such that there is a singular ethnicity (“human”) that has consistent rules applied to it no matter where you go on the planet?
Here is more on the antichrist matter (or non-matter) [3]
And the ultra-libertarians around it.
Curtis Yarvin is so well known now, especially in the bay area, that there are already jokes and comedy routines (cant find the references right now) about “parties with Yarvin” and people impersonating him to draw attention.
'Reboot' Revealed: Elon Musk's CEO-Dictator Playbook’ [0]
Silicon Valley Whistleblowers Warn Elon Musk 'Hijacking' Republicans to Control Entire US Government [1]
Sunday at the garden party for Curtis Yarvin and the new, new right [2]
[0] https://www.thenerdreich.com/reboot-elon-musk-ceo-dictator-d...
[1] https://bylinetimes.com/2025/02/07/silicon-valley-whistleblo...
[2] https://archive.ph/6xtwN. (FT)
[3] https://www.christianpost.com/news/palantir-ceo-peter-thiel-...
I also did some rough napkin math on his net worth and he’s barely more successful than the S&P 500. His two big breaks were getting lucky with PayPal and Facebook investments. The rest of his net worth is pretty much just as good as dumping those two companies’ proceeds into the stock market and sitting there.
People get scared of his companies but I bet their products kinda suck.
But really what I’m saying is detached from that. I’m saying that they are a run of the mill government contractor. If it wasn’t them it would be someone else or maybe it would even be software developed in-house.
Peter Thiel isn’t some kind of evil genius Bond villain for deciding to leave the ruthless competition of the private sector where you actually need to deliver a good product and instead live off of government contracts where vendor choices are more limited.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Target had more sophisticated data profiling tools than Palantir.
Here's a little perspective which might dispel you of that notion. If anything, the people you describe are willing to compromise any alleged libertarian principles they may hold for a seat at the table. It would arguably make them lesser-libertarians. They are commonly described as "Beltway Libertarians"
The distinction has been around for awhile now. As a rule, someone accepting state contracts probably isn't "ultra-libertarian". This probably won't make you more amenable to the cause of liberty, but the distinction is worth making. A little accuracy in your pejoratives goes a long way.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2005/07/lew-rockwell/regime-libe...
I miss the times where vision was determined by substance, not charisma or other irrelevant to final result traits.
Its probably the reason why we have so many charismatic people pushing the world to the edge by stupid agendas. People just buy it.
What is unreasonable is turning up in a discussion and saying either none of that pre-existing material counts for nothing or that I shouldn’t have to do any work here and instead you should “debate me bro”.
Also, unlikely that I'll debate you, I'm just only wondering what that reading material you refer to is about.
Edit: Which chat group, website, forum, video channel would you recommend?
It's expected you can't substantiate your words. Easy escape blaming someone else isn't it?
But I’m happy to be proved wrong so why don’t you go ahead and show me by giving your best faith interpretation as to why you think someone might call him a fascist.
You made accusation that is absolutely unsubstantiated and blatantly false. When suddenly asked to substantiate it, you bailed out by telling everyone to do their work.
Thats the answer why noone reasonable would engage in any discussions of that quality and manner.
...oh cool, an autobiographical piece by one of the most popular figures in religious literature...