Our Stop Censoring Abortion Campaign Uncovers a Social Media Censorship Crisis
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
eff.orgOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
30/100
Social Media CensorshipAbortion RightsFree Speech
Key topics
Social Media Censorship
Abortion Rights
Free Speech
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) launched a 'Stop Censoring Abortion' campaign, which revealed widespread censorship of abortion-related content on social media platforms, sparking concerns about free speech and biased moderation.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
7m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
1.4
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 1, 2025 at 10:40 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 1, 2025 at 10:47 AM EDT
7m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 1, 2025 at 4:45 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45438277Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:53:34 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
As far as I'm concerned, this is exactly the sort of censorship that should happen in a free market. The alternative gives the government punitive powers it should never possess.
"The district court is dismissed today, for the 145th consecutive time our defendant failed to appear for roll call. Upon his 150th infraction a Networked Hunter-Killer squad will search the web for his profiles and terminate any trace of his posting. Upon the 300th infraction, Elon Musk will release a video personally accusing him of being a pedophile. Comply... or face unthinkable punishments."
I think one issue is social media is inherently monopolistic. It has network effects from having more users, so a new social media network has trouble being valuable. Sure there have been rare exceptions like TikTok, but if you’re offering a similar social media service as an existing network rather than innovating on the format, your service is worth less because it has fewer users, and the service won’t grow to be competitive. If there isn’t a working competitive environment, I think that is justification for more regulation that makes those companies behave more like government agencies.