Openai Needs a Trillion Dollars in the Next Four Years
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
wheresyoured.atTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
AIEnergy ConsumptionComputing
Key topics
AI
Energy Consumption
Computing
The article discusses OpenAI's massive energy requirements, estimated to be around $1 trillion in the next four years, sparking concerns about the environmental impact and the implications of such massive computing power.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
9m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
1.6
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 27, 2025 at 4:25 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 27, 2025 at 4:35 AM EDT
9m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 27, 2025 at 4:31 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45394071Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:29:25 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
That's my key take-away from reading this.
I hope the majority of this is going to be powered by nuclear or hydro. That's a lot of power.
The waste problem still has not been solved. Instead the USG threw up their hands and walked away. I don’t know how other countries are addressing it. We have a temporary (read 2-3 generation) solution we can fall back on, but this is a can worse than climate change we are kicking towards future generations.
I am fully aware of advances in nuclear tech but that doesn’t solve the problem, it just delays the tipping point
It gets sealed in fuck-off huge concrete cylinders, and the volume of waste compared to the energy generated, it's just a no brainer. Also depending on reactor type the waste can be recycled.
Are you referring to the 40 year "service life" of the containment units? Or something else?
Service life of containment units is one thing. Where to store those sealed off cylinders. And the increase in waste as power demand skyrockets.
During the time I was involved in the negotiations of waste storage (which was made extremely difficult due to NIMBY votes), the prediction of energy demand was a lot lower (which probably is what led to the widespread acceptance of nuclear). Now that AI is anticipating enormous energy demands, and eyeing nuclear as that energy source, this problem is returning with a vengeance. Let me be very clear this is not a problem in either our lifetime, our children’s lifetime, or our children’s children’s lifetime. But neither was oil during the industrial revolution..
For those downvoting, please provide a response and have a discussion.
How's that beamed solar thing from simcity 2000 coming along?
Global warming from fossil fuels is going to be a problem before mountains of nuclear waste, no?
Not to worry, Trump plans to burn enough coal to black out the sky and protect us all.
That’s just nonsense. Even if we turn a large area into a radioactive waste dump, that problem pales in comparison to the massive external and internal migrations, food crop failure and wars that climate change will cause in our lifetimes.
I mean, they wouldn't be if I had any money invested in Nvidia (I foretold their rise twenty years ago, but then as today I was too poor to keep any investments, in Nvidia or otherwise).
But, in general, I think we are going to keep building ocean-boiling amounts of compute, which we are going to use to do many grisly things and some good ones. I hope I can avoid the bad stuff and benefit from the good, despite it being statistically unlikely. It's called hope :-) .