Not for Human Consumption
Key topics
The dark side of biohacking comes to light as people experiment with hormonal pathways and supplements, often with reckless abandon, sparking a heated debate about the risks and benefits of self-experimentation. While some commenters, like jrm4, hail these individuals as "heroic" pioneers, others, such as Fiveplus and readthenotes1, sound a cautionary note, pointing out the dangers of unregulated self-medication and the limitations of individual knowledge. The discussion reveals a deep divide between those who see the regulatory state as slow and bureaucratic, stifling innovation (SecondHandTofu), and those who believe it's a necessary safeguard against unqualified individuals playing doctor (adrianN). As the conversation unfolds, it becomes clear that the line between innovation and recklessness is perilously thin.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
17m
Peak period
26
0-6h
Avg / period
7.8
Based on 31 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Jan 3, 2026 at 6:26 AM EST
5d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Jan 3, 2026 at 6:43 AM EST
17m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
26 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Jan 5, 2026 at 2:49 PM EST
2d ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I think most regulation is a concave quadratic function of regulations vs benefit. At zero regulation it can be very bad, but there also must be a point at which something is so smothered in regulation that doing anything is impossible. So there must be a maxima somewhere between the two points.
All I think is that the current state of drug regulation quite a long way to the right of that maxima, that doesn't mean I think we should remove it all to zero, or that some other things aren't to the left of it and need more regulation!
Probably most disagreements over this sort of thing are just people who disagree about which side of the maxima we're on.
Certainly more important than other definitely dangerous activities like wingsuits and motorcycles.
Was hen heroic? No, just gullible.
On the actual efficacy and safety fair point. But we're all adults here (I hope). And as for "society's consequences" other people mention most of these compounds are taken is such tiny amounts it is very unlikely they are harmful once they have been out for a couple of years and people have been taking them(for example 250ug every second day for bpc-157 my favourite compound that is proven by research to improve necrotic wound healing in mice and significantly improve injury recovery in my personal experience).
As for modification of hormonal pathways. Retatrutide is in a middle of human trials. There is no indication so far it is harmful. Personally I've not taken it (despite my doc literally pitching ozempic to me a month ago, my bmi is 31 and I never seriously tried to diet in my life - I decided to try "the natural way" first - to be fair the doc was also interested in the improvement in the glucose metabolism not just weight loss in my case). But I might in next 6 months if I don't get the results I want.
I wish there were some good that came out of this. But these are completely unusable results. It's uncontrolled and not being studied.
Did their testicles fall off because of LLM drug 32, drug 34, drug 2, or a combination of all the drugs they took at the same time? Or maybe it's a combination of their genetic makeup and drug 4.
It'd be like trying to glean any useful medical information from any drug addict. Was the heart attack caused by meth, huffing paint, or one too many cheese burgers? Who knows.
This is nothing new. Numerous “scenes” do the same. There’s the longevity scene connected to this one.
There’s the psychonaut scene. That’s a bit from the erowid/and misc scene of the early 2010s.
There’s the bodybuilding / gym scene which probably is the longest and oldest subset of members.
I’m not sure which niche communities I’m missing.
It can be understood as hobby group that focuses on drugs instead of another topic. It’s a fine line between reckless and leading edge that most don’t follow imo but it’s a community with its own rules.
Well, six years after he bought it the bike’s frame cracked in half as he was parking it. Somehow he avoided that happening in traffic.
‘Chinese Peptides’ Are the Latest Biohacking Trend in the Tech World
https://archive.is/Pu1y3
[one day, she accidentally doubled her dose. “My hair started falling out after a month because I was malnourished,” Ms. Bowman said. “It made my heart rate go up 10 beats per minute at night.” Still, she plans to keep going.]
It is extremely irrational to do something with so much downside risk. We each only get one human mind and one human body, so no matter what upsides there are, nothing should justify actions which allow one to “go to zero”.
But as another commenter said, if these folks are willing to be guinea pigs, okay.