No More Data Centers: Ohio Township Pushes Back Against Influx of Amazon, Others
Posted4 months agoActive3 months ago
dispatch.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
Data CentersLocal GovernanceAmazonTaxation
Key topics
Data Centers
Local Governance
Amazon
Taxation
An Ohio township is pushing back against the construction of new data centers, citing concerns over tax abatements and infrastructure strain, sparking debate over the economic and environmental impact of these projects.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
38s
Peak period
46
Day 1
Avg / period
23.5
Comment distribution47 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 47 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 8, 2025 at 9:02 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 8, 2025 at 9:02 AM EDT
38s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
46 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 19, 2025 at 10:05 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45167729Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 6:56:52 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Lol, gotta love the scam. Small town politicians must get some amazing bribes.
>While under construction about a year ago, a worker at the Warren Road Amazon facility was crushed to death, Stewart said. Another fell to his death in February at the Industrial Parkway site. And an April 17 fire at the Industrial Parkway center tied up firefighters for more than 30 hours, causing $50 million in damage, Stewart said. During each call, Stewart said, Amazon officials have not been helpful. "They wanted to do background checks on all my firefighters; I wouldn't let them," he said. "And we've struggled to gain access to emergencies. They'll stop us at the gate, and our medic units have been delayed. They're denying us access to patients.
You immediately arrest have any employee interfering with emergency response and throw them in jail. Repeat until Amazon runs out of employees dumb enough to continue doing so.
Imagine that you work for a 3 letter US agency and is storing confidential data on AWS. Would you allow random individuals (yes even for emergency personnel) to have unfetter access to your computation and storage systems? What about health data? What about data belonging to other countries? Do you do a sweep for unauthorized remote access device after the incident?
My understanding is that the fire department has pretty broad legal authority to tell you where to shove your policies your if your building is on fire. They can legally smash down your doors, haul you out kicking and screaming, and detain you outside of the building while they put the fire out.
> You immediately arrest have any employee interfering with emergency response and throw them in jail. Repeat until Amazon runs out of employees dumb enough to continue doing so.
Absolutely. Ex-paramedic/firefighter. We responded to a cult facility once (think Nexium-esque but "bigger"). 911 call for chest pain. Stopped at the gate by armed guards. "You can't bring your ambulance in". Uh, yes, we can. "No. We can't allow you in, then." My officer at the time, to the head guard, "Are you the individual who called 911?" "No, I'm not, someone in there did." "Alright, so to be very clear before I call law enforcement out here, you are acknowledging you are interfering with emergency services performing their duty by actively preventing us from getting to our patient?"
We got let in.
Most facilities don’t have it. Those that do have their own medical personnel (and tanks, usually).
I would legitimately have driven my car through that building if I lived here.
And last time I went to a Datacentre it may be an eye sore but it doesn't produce any noise at all. Do all DC in US produce noise like that?
Because the people who live there voted for the kind of people who would allow it to happen. And they'll do it again, every time.
Cornelius Vanderbilt
It's probably not legal, although this is an area of law that is generally delegated to the most local levels of governments, so the details will vary based on where exactly you're located. There's going to be a catch-all public nuisance ordinance this would fall under, although there may also be a specific noise ordinance that this is violating.
A datacenter operator approaches the township, selling the town commissioners on a project that will make them an "AI hub". The town leaders don't know the correct questions to ask, especially regarding noise, but they know they'll be lambasted if they turn this down. And the developer claims they have a dozen other sites that are shovel-ready if this town gives them any hassle.
The neighbor probably gets a postcard in the mail letting them know about an upcoming development hearing. This postcard is easily overlooked among the day's junk mail, and it doesn't have many details, anyways. Or, perhaps the neighbor has an attitude similar to many rural residents, and figures whatever happens on their neighbor's property isn't their concern (these are large properties, after all).
Even if the neighbor does complain, they're one voice against the many that want to see new development in their town—perhaps the first in recent memory (other than the two Dollar General stores that drove their old independent stores out of business). And so much in small town government depends on interpersonal relationships; perhaps the neighbor isn't well-connected, or a town commissioner even has an old grudge against them.
All of this is happening with little notice from the public. The newspaper was bought out by Gannett a decade ago; it's now thrice-weekly edition is 90% wire service stories, with the local coverage consisting almost entirely of "hard-hitting" crime coverage written by a reporter who is also the only local reporter for three other papers.
I’m sure all those jobs from coinmint materialized.
Oh wait, they didn’t…
I have heard sounds like that from AI/ML host racks, but that's inside the datahall, which makes me wonder what kind of building and cooling design they have.
Heres a newer model from Bitmain https://bitmain.digital/antminers/antminer-s19pro/index.html
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/local/2025/09/08/ohio-to...
Focusing on just the media side of things, you already see how easy it is to spread propaganda and it's only getting worse with SkyDance's merger with CBS. Not sure I have any answers here, but it's definitely a problem we need to solve sooner rather than later.
Dispatch.com link: not sure why the link I added (or thought I added) wasn't to the Dispatch article: https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/local/2025/09/08/ohio-to...
As for the safety record, I think it's fair to say that the issues are largely due to AWS leadership in the central Ohio region not taking safety seriously and internal politics where leaders tend to be more concerned with their own self-interest, avoiding a PIP, managing perception, and advancing their careers.
There's a lot of talk about prioritizing safety but there's a distinct lack of ownership from the senior leaders. The relationships between Safety, Security and Operations are more adversarial than collaborative but it's easy to simply ignore the problem and/or push the blame to others while nothing gets solved. I have plenty of anecdotes I could share but it would just be airing dirty laundry and ultimately not productive.
sample: https://dailycoin.com/crypto-mining-law-under-threat-road-to...
1 more comments available on Hacker News