Newton for Ladies (1737) – Newtonianism Vs. Cartesianism
Posted4 months agoActive3 months ago
whipplelib.hps.cam.ac.ukResearchstory
calmpositive
Debate
20/100
History of ScienceNewtonianismCartesianism
Key topics
History of Science
Newtonianism
Cartesianism
The post shares a historical resource on 'Newton for Ladies' (1737), sparking discussion on the history of science and the contrast between Newtonianism and Cartesianism.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
3d
Peak period
8
66-72h
Avg / period
3.3
Comment distribution13 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 13 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 18, 2025 at 1:24 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 21, 2025 at 7:57 AM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
8 comments in 66-72h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 22, 2025 at 7:27 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45292404Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:11:42 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_newtonian...
[Edit] Wow, it's actually blocked in the UK for people who don't prove that they're over 18.
Quip aside, the history of science of that period just overwhelms me. What a time ! Galileo, DesCartes, Barrow, Leibnitz, Huygens, Newton, Halley, Hooke.
The 'Great Man' fallacy no doubt applies as well to Galileo et al. as it would more obviously be someone's objection to my contemporary list.
I consider their contribution to the body of human knowledge or humanity to be of quite dubious merit. Very smart and successful businessman for sure, very good at enriching themselves, but that's about it. At best they can be compared to Rockefeller, Edison, that too at best.
On the other hand one can argue that a lot of our material welfare (as a product of science and engineering) is a direct consequence of Newton's accomplishments. Of course he did not start the fire all by himself.