New Us Curb on High-Skill Immigrant Workers Ignores Evidence of Its Likely Harms
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
piie.comOtherstory
skepticalnegative
Debate
60/100
Immigration PolicyHigh-Skill WorkersUs Economy
Key topics
Immigration Policy
High-Skill Workers
Us Economy
The new US curb on high-skill immigrant workers is criticized for ignoring evidence of its potential harms, with commenters discussing potential responses from hiring teams and companies.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
5
2-4h
Avg / period
1.8
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 24, 2025 at 7:45 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 24, 2025 at 9:40 PM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 26, 2025 at 1:26 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Discussion (9 comments)
Showing 9 comments
kjkjadksj
3 months ago
1 replyAre hiring teams responding by favoring US citizens already or is this a “wait and see” sort of thing with no change to hiring?
vsskanth
3 months ago
1 replyCitizens are always favored. It costs way more money, lawyers, time and paperwork to hire someone on a visa. HR hates it.
more_corn
3 months ago
1 replyThe word on the street is it was cheaper to hire foreigners than locals.
This probably changes that.
DiscourseFan
3 months ago
2 repliesI mean they are cheaper initially, but as they gain experience and knowledge they aren’t cheaper than anyone else. The difference is that initial cost saving blocks a lot of people who are already US citizens from developing those skills and knowledge.
spacebacon
3 months ago
1 replyOne more reason for employers to invest in their local communities now … This comes down to cheap education. The skills can be acquired cheaper abroad. Companies can provide free education now or pay the 100k which is close to the cost of education here.
DiscourseFan
3 months ago
Yes I mean Trump's entire economic policy agenda domestically is to enact massive corporate taxes for any company that avoids hiring/training Americans to get cheaper labor from abroad. The problem is that the US has basically depended on importing cheap foreign labor from its inception, thats the basic economic model here and the only reason that countries like China or India don't need external immigration is because they already have internal migration. I remember I was taking a taxi in Kochi once and the driver was complaining about all these northern Indian economic migrants displacing local workers because the wages in South India are much higher than in North India. But the US does not have any poor workers or a peasant population. Unfortunately, all those good, cheap workers are going to end up elsewhere now and the west will probably begin to suffer economic slowdown because their workers don't want to get priced out. Eventually all the borders will come down, since they harm competition.
seivan
3 months ago
You forgot how beholden the visa holder is, which aside to cost is the other benefit.
mbfg
3 months ago
doesn't this just increase the desire by companies to hire people remotely in other countries?
malshe
3 months ago
WSJ reported today that 100 K fees was basically the bone Lutnick threw at the immigration opponent groups in exchange for their support for the $1 million Trump branded Gold card.
View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45367352Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:53:34 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.