National Park to Remove Photo of Enslaved Man's Scars
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
washingtonpost.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
30/100
National ParksSlaveryHistorical Representation
Key topics
National Parks
Slavery
Historical Representation
A national park is removing a photo of an enslaved man's scars, sparking discussion about historical representation and the complexities of presenting the past.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
37s
Peak period
4
0-2h
Avg / period
2.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 16, 2025 at 2:37 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 16, 2025 at 2:38 PM EDT
37s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
4 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 17, 2025 at 2:34 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45266086Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:51:32 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
But in the modern day you see revisionist history insisting that no such realignment ever occurred, and that the R's are the same "Party of Lincoln" they always were. Enter news stories such as this one. If you aren't sure that a realignment took place, ask which movement in the present day regularly celebrates and defends and invokes that iconography of the confederate south, and tries to defend and preserve historical artifacts that celebrate the confederate south while removing those that criticize it.
If the history of the 20th century wasn't already clear, I think even just the last 5-10 years, and especially this year, 2025, give all kinds of new evidence demonstrating that the realignment really happened.
Coming out of the civil rights movement, it was the democrats who wanted to change the status quo and the Republicans who wanted to defend it.
In the present period of endless culture war and polticization of everything, it seems that the democrats are the ones on the side of the status quo and existing power structures. They want to shove everyone into identity groups, put those groups into hierarchies, they want to shame certain groups and grant new privileges to others.
A lot of people are exhausted by the culture war, tired of having every aspect of our lives coopted to remind us to feel bad about ourselves and to hate each other. I don't think Trump is really offering a new path here yet, but he's recognizing what people say all the time in private and which the democrats refuse to accept.
This view seems to be starkly at odds with today's reality - ICE raids target "certain groups" - all out-groups, and this is not driven by Democrats.
It is also incoherent with "democrats are .. on the side of the status quo and existing power structures".
This seems more like projection than anything else.
This has very limited relevance to ICE raids. Again, that is not the reality.
That said, this article is about removing references to slavery in national parks, so I'm not sure where your point is going.