Nasa's Juno Mission Leaves Legacy of Science at Jupiter
Key topics
NASA's Juno mission has significantly advanced our understanding of Jupiter, revealing new insights into the planet's formation, physics, and chemistry, and sparking discussions about future space exploration and the potential for new discoveries.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
21
60-72h
Avg / period
9
Based on 36 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
21 comments in 60-72h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 26, 2025 at 3:44 AM EDT
5 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
1: https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-probe-could-intercept-inte...
It also happens that NASA is too busy doing damage control to consider anything new. But even if they were, it won't be because Loeb suggested it.
What I don't understand on his Wikipedia page is this bit in the second sentence: "Loeb is the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University". Does he work there under the alias "Frank B. Baird Jr." or what does this sentence mean? Or is the position called one person but another person fulfills the role?
As for Loeb himself, I'm only passingly familiar with him in passing because of coverage since ‘Oumuamua, but it seems like he is a fairly typical asgtrophysicist who decided for some reason that he would launch a crusade declaring anything entering the Solar System from interstellar space must be an alien probe or spaceship.
source > bloviating
>But even if they were, it won't be because Loeb suggested it.
Wow, what an utter arbitrarily position-hedging comment
Referring to their figs. 3–7, that distance figure is a hard limit—there's no possibility they have of getting closer to the comet than that.
(Keep in mind this is just one random interstellar comet; there are many, many others like it—there will be infinite opportunities to study one—and Avi Loeb is a proven clown who consistently misrepresents these things for drama).
[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21402 ("Intercepting 3I/ATLAS at Closest Approach to Jupiter with the Juno spacecraft")
Tangential remark: there was a similar proposal for the end-of-life of the Cassini orbiter—it didn't happen, but, there was enough delta-v for the theoretical option, of escaping Saturn and redirecting it to a second mission at Uranus[1]. It was also a dodgy idea, since the transfer time would have been ridiculous (~20 years)—it'd have been a long-shot for Cassini to have survived that long.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassini_retirement#End_of_miss... ("Cassini retirement#End of mission options")
Juno's mission is at end-of-life at the proposal's starting point. So now tell me again about the risks.
And even the 27Mkm number requires very optimistic assumptions, including that the main engine that has had huge problems during its mission would work perfectly for one continuous burn to exhaustion. Realistically, that's not going to happen.
It is worth noting that this comes two weeks after the authors posted https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12213 "Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?"
They describe this first paper as "largely a pedagogical exercise" - clearly, if they're now providing emails to news outlets recommending this course change, their view of the target audience has certainly evolved. Orson Welles would be proud.
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avi_Loeb
I don't think considering his proposal might have damaged NASA's reputation. I also don't think the interstellar object is an alien probe, I just was excited we got a chance at looking at an interstellar object, that may be totally unlike Solar System objects, and possibly far older. Crap?
There's one image on the NASA page and others. Any more links?
https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/comets/3i-atlas/
https://esahubble.org/images/heic2509a/
Now I feel the urge to dispute this!
https://science.nasa.gov/gallery/junocam-images/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter#Size_and_mass
Combine that with the fact that the Juno probe has now more than doubled its expected life, and this whole mission serves as as good of an argument for continuing to fund NASA as you’re going to see.