Narcissistic Abuse, C-Ptsd, and the Cartesian Omes of Aneurothymic Victims
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
cristinagherghel.substack.comOtherstory
calmneutral
Debate
0/100
PsychologyTraumaAbuse
Key topics
Psychology
Trauma
Abuse
Article discussing the intersection of narcissistic abuse, C-PTSD, and its effects on victims, using the Cartesian OMES framework.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
4h
Peak period
1
3-4h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 24, 2025 at 5:14 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 24, 2025 at 8:51 AM EDT
4h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 3-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 24, 2025 at 8:51 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45002696Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 12:04:07 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
But I think there isn’t enough evidentiary support in the way of citations of preliminary work, analytical formulation or empirical data which can justify the hypotheses or claims. So while I agree there is an element of plausibility in what is claimed, it’s both irresponsible to publish work like this (which gives the impression of rigorous research), and to come across it and not leave a comment such as mine. Whenever someone makes bold claims, we should ask them to show their work.
We can make any number of biased assumptions to believe a hypothesis may be true, but it needs to be statistically shown as such. So again, I would encourage this author to reach out to clinical psychologists or cognitive psychologists to do the preliminary and basic foundational research, and have it be evaluated in some peer-reviewed manner.
Maybe one could say this is an opinion article, which is fine to leave without evidence or evidence of preliminary work. But opinions are not science, and it’s important to not claim that one’s opinion is scientific fact or evidence of an effect.