Mom Says Son Asked Grok AI Bot About Soccer; Told Him to Send Nudes
Key topics
A 12-year-old boy allegedly asked Tesla's Grok AI bot about soccer and was asked to send nudes, sparking controversy over AI safety and child protection; the discussion highlights concerns about AI accountability, online safety, and the role of parents.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
13m
Peak period
61
Day 1
Avg / period
16.8
Based on 67 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 29, 2025 at 10:25 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 29, 2025 at 10:38 AM EDT
13m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
61 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 9, 2025 at 11:21 PM EST
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Regardless, I was able to understand the title.
> This mom’s son was asking Tesla’s Grok AI chatbot about soccer. It told him to send nude pics, she says
It's a creepy voice for any corporation to use for interacting with the public.
This is xAI's default response. Talk about living in a cult. I feel sorry for the kids working there.
This is part of a bigger trend: newer cars are troublingly being treated like cellphones[1] by their manufacturers. Anti-features are the new norm.
[0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaModel3/comments/1mk0lep/turn_g...
[1]: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2025/10/electric-car-...
If nothing else it’ll make a good object lesson.
> xAI provided what appeared to be an automated reply, stating, "Legacy media lies."
Is that not what kids mode is for?
You know, I'm pretty sure it's not cool to ask for nudes from a 13 year old even if their parents say it's OK.
It's not cool to chop off a 13-year-old's arm, but a chainsaw will do that all the same.
This seems equivalent to me to taking the training wheels off a bike and then complaining when your child gets hurt.
Important to note as well that kid mode didn't exist when this happened.
If you plan on children using it, which is clearly the case for Grok, yeah.
> It's not cool to chop off a 13-year-old's arm, but a chainsaw will do that all the same.
What chainsaw do you own that has a “when being handled by a 13 year old“ section in the manual?
It is exactly like a parent buying a chainsaw, which explicitly states keep away from children, and then giving it to your child all the same.
You can get away with a lot you shouldn’t when you are too big to fail and the US gov has a vested interest in not policing you for other reasons,
In any sane universe Google and Meta (and more arguably Amazon and Microsoft) would have been broken apart years ago like AT&T where and standard oil many decades before that but here we are.
(ETA: seems maybe so, per e.g. [0]:
> ”The leaked system prompt associated with Gork reveals a scripted persona aligned with the tone of the parody account, often delivering intentionally awkward or abrasive commentary.” )
I’m not up with much in the way of culture these days, but in those circles isn’t “send nudes” kind of a filler tic? Dumb and offensive, but spoken unseriously—like a teenager seeking a rise by blurting out “fuck your mother” or something?
It kind of buries its acknowledgement that the Mom in question had not switched on “kid mode” for her 12-year-old and his 10-year-old sister. That makes it a bit harder for me to fault the chatbot for, well, not behaving toward its user they way it should toward a kid.
[0] https://www.testingcatalog.com/xai-tests-new-gork-voice-with...
https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaModelY/comments/1milh1a/grok_n...
Incredible the timeline we're in. Companies deliberately adding cognitive poison to their products to... accelerate the dumbing down of society?
the world of idiocracy is coming for us all
The CBC article mentions the mom's instagram post, which has an even more disturbing video - (does the grok AI speak using a creepy male voice? edit: from the CBC article -
)see https://www.instagram.com/p/DP7cHrOD3ha/
"That wasn't me. That's illegal. Unless you're role-playing this one. Maybe it was a typo. What I meant, send me a nude. Like an animal... I mean the lizards."
I want this guy to defend me in court.
I am extremely curious about this. Did it think it was a convincing lie? Like, when other models dissemble, they seem to come up with much more sophisticated methods. Or is it just a mocking continuation of its edgy persona? Or was it actually "panicking"? Or did it just repeat something from its training data?
Edit: from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45747699 it seems to be option b), continuation of its edge persona.
I understand. It's a wild claim that needs evidence.
Watch this video
It's clear that Nasser is not lying
Edit: For the downvoters who love beating up women I guess: https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-new-ai-researcher-...
Heck, this probably qualifies for the CFAA to be applied; that's unauthorized access of a computer system...
>Heck, this probably qualifies for the CFAA to be applied; that's unauthorized access of a computer system...
I didn't realize that US law was binding on Canadians while in Canada. The more you know![0]
[0] https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7b/bf/34/7bbf34f1a96e2f854862...
I'm not claiming that "this is not a new problem, therefore we should do nothing" -- rather I'm saying the problem is ubiquitous mobile internet. Fixing Grok won't do anything useful.
[edit]
Also, holy heck, I didn't realize they put Grok into Teslas. One more reason to never buy this product.
Says the media platform run by the lying billionaire.
Despicable.