Mcdonald's Removes AI-Generated Ad After Backlash
Key topics
As McDonald's swiftly pulled its AI-generated Christmas ad in response to public backlash, commenters weighed in on the controversy, revealing a deep divide over the role of AI in creative work. While some, like Insanity, found the outrage overblown, others, such as A_D_E_P_T, pointed out that AI is reflexively dismissed as "slop" by a vocal segment of the population. The debate simmered with welferkj arguing that resistance to AI is futile, while aldarisbm lamented that GenAI is targeting creative work, sparking concerns about its impact on artistic expression. As the discussion unfolded, a consensus emerged that the quality and ubiquity of AI tools will ultimately shape public perception.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
20m
Peak period
21
0-1h
Avg / period
5.7
Based on 40 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 11, 2025 at 5:53 AM EST
23 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 11, 2025 at 6:13 AM EST
20m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
21 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 11, 2025 at 5:20 PM EST
22 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
It is, or used to be at least, one of the most creative visual industry too, because of relatively big budgets, short duration, fast release cycles.
I think we will look back at AI "slop" as a temporary point in time where the media people were creating was just bad. And what people actually hated was bad AI content that people were trying to defend as the "future". AI video will just fall into the background as a tool creators use.
At least, that is what I hope compared to the outcome where there are no creators and people just watch Sora videos tailored to them all day.
https://theoatmeal.com/comics/ai_art said it better than I ever could
These days, though, it's not as common as it used to be. Kimi K2, in particular, is a weirdly good and stylistically flexible writer.
How sad, what it does to us.
I now see that is mainly targeting Creative Work, and it's really really sad.
I think we as humans find joy in creative work and it is frustrating that we as a collective decided that is the thing we will take away from humans.
The AI tools can produce the work, the quality can be good but taste is lost as the professionals are removed from the process.
There’s a quote I can’t remember the source of… anyone can have an idea but not everyone can execute on it. AI gives the illusion you can create your ideas and compete with actual professionals
I was trying to sign up my step dad to SiriusXM (he wanted it) so I called their phone number. The first interaction with the company is them saying you are speaking to an AI and to ask what I'm trying to do. So I said something like "I'd like to sign up for a new account but have a question about the promotional price". It said it couldn't understand the request and I had to repeat things a few times until it gave up and sent me to a human where the question was resolved quickly but it took minutes to reach a human.
It's wild to me that companies are putting AI at the top of their sales funnel.
That's an example of a weird heuristic I frequently see applied to corporations: assume some awful decision is the result of some scarily hyper-competent design process, and construct a speculative explanation along those lines.
But must of us have worked in corporations, an know how stupid and incompetent they can be.
> Or, they just didn't study that. Or, the decision-makers don't contact customer support for themselves and so don't know how infuriatingly unhelpful AI ones are.
Occam's razor points to this as the reason.
Beautiful visuals, beautiful story telling, an actual message... ads can be more than "consume our shit"
It's lame but it works
> “It’s never about replacing craft, it’s about expanding the toolbox. The vision, the taste, the leadership … that will always be human,” she said.
> “And here’s the part people don’t see: the hours that went into this job far exceeded a traditional shoot. Ten people, five weeks, full-time.”
That response sounds like it was written by ChatGPT, which is a fantastic piece of tone-deaf irony from the creators.
Cringe. I suspect the same people who needed social comments and international media coverage to figure out that Christmas might actually be a nice time for some people are the ones who decided that video was appropriate in content and aesthetics. Also, that quote reads a bit like a machine desperately trying to understand humans.
It reminds me of Apple’s Crush! commercial: https://adage.com/video/crush-ipad-pro-apple/