Many Popular Beliefs About Allergies Aren't Supported by the Evidence
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
medscape.comResearchstory
skepticalmixed
Debate
40/100
AllergiesPharmaceuticalsMedical Evidence
Key topics
Allergies
Pharmaceuticals
Medical Evidence
The article challenges common beliefs about allergies, sparking a discussion about the role of pharmaceuticals and the potential for over-medicalization.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
2
1-2h
Avg / period
2
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 6, 2025 at 4:34 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM EST
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 6, 2025 at 6:26 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45840718Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 7:55:51 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
>First-generation antihistamines have a longer onset and shorter duration of action with less efficacy than second-generation antihistamines, such as cetirizine (Zyrtec), desloratadine (Clarinex), fexofenadine (Allegra), and>loratadine (Claritin).
Boo for me, then. I must be some sort of rare creature. For me, all those second generation antihistamines might as well be sugar pills, except for cetirizine, which might have a tiny impact (and possibly none at all). On the other hand, chlorpheniramine has a very noticeable effect, although I agree it is short-lived (I have to take it three times per day).
there is always someone who takes 50 drugs because of an allergy. How do they know its not somatic
cough and colds and sneezes are big money. Psychological symptoms manufactured into somatic illnesses and then hypochondriasis.
look at the incredible increase in psychiatric drug use since the 60's. And they still dont work. dare I say paradoxical reaction.
Its Ok, I have only spent 25 years of my life sitting opposite the very same people that I am talking about. Listening to their stories.
So, my dear patient, why are you taking ant-depressants? because my GP prescribed them. A no mark GP who has had no psychological training.
This is probably in part the result of the move towards a very biological model of psychiatry that began with the development of the first generation of psychotropic drugs in the 1960s, and which was granted ‘official’ status with the publication of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM III ) classification in 1980.
This is the psychiatric classification system of the American Psychiatric Association and has become the dominant model worldwide. It involved a paradigm shift which left very little place for psychological models in the understanding of mental disorders, and even less for the most complicated elements of this understanding.
just look at those names! a huge list of drugs that do nothing!
placebo created the allergy and placebo reduces the symptoms. the human brain is an amazing thing.
what has the human race become? when most people spend their entire lives taking and looking for a fucking pill to solve their problems.