'mamdani Effect' Is Seeing More People Moving to New York, Not Leaving It
Key topics
The "Mamdani Effect" article's claim that people are flocking to New York City is being thoroughly debunked by commenters, who point out that a sale doesn't necessarily imply net migration, as someone is always on the other side of the transaction. Some users are poking fun at the idea that investment dollars are pouring into NYC, potentially outpacing actual people, while others are highlighting the issue of luxury apartments sitting empty. The discussion is veering off into broader skepticism about the article's conclusions and the city's politics, with some commenters expressing cynicism about campaign promises and the impact of mayoral changes. Amidst the snark and criticism, a few users are sharing related anecdotes, like the phenomenon of "condos of the living dead."
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
3
3-4h
Avg / period
1.7
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 12, 2025 at 5:39 PM EST
24 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 12, 2025 at 7:20 PM EST
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 3-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 13, 2025 at 4:51 AM EST
23 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Of course the article doesn't mention statistics around either of these.
Notably prescient
At which point they can afford to hold on to them through lean times in anticipation of future appreciation, and in that case it doesn't make much difference if there is anyone living there or not.
Not that I would want to.