Loss of Moist Broadleaf Forest in Africa Has Turned a Carbon Sink Into Source
Key topics
The alarming transformation of Africa's moist broadleaf forests from a carbon sink to a source has sparked a lively discussion, with commenters pointing out that this phenomenon isn't unique to Africa, citing similar trends in Finland and Austria. As the conversation unfolds, a consensus emerges that the root cause lies not in profit, but in a flawed accounting system that privatizes gains while socializing costs, also known as externalities. Some commenters took a darker turn, joking that humanity might be the first species to go extinct due to prioritizing profit over existence, while others sarcastically suggested that the solution lies in ignoring "alarmist doomsayers" or relying on tech moguls to colonize Mars. Amidst the banter, a poignant quote stood out: "The economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment."
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
50m
Peak period
16
0-3h
Avg / period
5
Based on 30 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 28, 2025 at 3:59 PM EST
4d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 28, 2025 at 4:49 PM EST
50m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
16 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Dec 30, 2025 at 6:25 AM EST
3d ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://www.icos-cp.eu/news-and-events/news/finlands-forests...
Planting more trees than you cut down is an effective way of offsetting CO2 emissions.
https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000268965/vom-retter-zu...
Moreover private owners optimize for wealth under capitalism, not preservation. Look at why oil companies want to do to the sea and arctic. Or the replacement of Amazonian forest with pasture for beef grazing.
African countries suffer under the poverty created by colonial extraction of both resources and people, followed by being charged for the privilege of having their resources taken, and saddled with unpayable loans. Those loans also placing them in a position where they are forced to allow western countries to continue to extract, and are prevented from protecting their national interests.
If Africa was allowed to own its wealth and develop without negative interference (assassinations, extraction, the world bank, foreign militaries) it would be the richest region on the planet.
Anyway, I read on HN that AI was about to solve climate change any time now. I'm sure prompting LLMs the right way will harness the world knowledge to generatively hallucinate a way for trees to grow better.
"The economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment"
However it will cause ecosystem collapse which we rely on for food due to too rapid change which nature can't handle, and it will change which areas are viable for human habitation and agriculture. Meaning many many people will have to move.
And of course mass forced migration combined with shrinking resources is a recipe for global war. See how popular migrants are now in many countries, and consider half the world having to migrate to survive. Poor people living in areas that become uninhabitable (and who never caused the problem in the first place) will move to a better place where it's likely the current inhabitants will protest.
And a global war is very likely to lead to extinction with the WMD tech humanity has now.
All we need to do is stop trying to be richer than everyone else and to work together :(
Citation absolutely required. This is not in the IPCC reports.
You’re just making up stories of doom.
My in-laws are a lost cause. I can make immediate ground in most discussions, but give it a day and they're back to their same FUD arguments that I'd just taken down the day before.
The pitiable thing about their position is, I think, that they want the lifestyle they lived for their kids and grandkids, and think that this "green scam" will impoverish and threaten the viability of their extending family.
Unfortunately the future could be much worse than that, but for basically the opposite reason.
It's surreal watching human denial working in real-time.
...waits 50 years...
But I also see multiple places they mention the changes as being at least partly due to logging or wood harvesting. Which seems like biomass being removed and yet not going into the atmosphere.