Judge Skewers $1.5b Anthropic Settlement with Authors in Pirated Books Case
Key topics
A judge has raised concerns over Anthropic's $1.5B settlement with authors in a pirated books case, questioning its fairness and potential implications for other copyright holders; commenters discuss the complexities of payouts and potential future lawsuit risks.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
41m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 8, 2025 at 7:13 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 8, 2025 at 7:54 PM EDT
41m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 8, 2025 at 7:54 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I am also really unsure a simple judgement "it's ok" gets them out of jail free. Contextually, THIS judge ruled it meets some bar for SOME use of the works. Other judges, other courts could still disagree, IPR in printed works is complicated.
Personally I've always disliked the scofflaw aspect of how the training happened. Using the torrents.. that was an amazing act. Not that it isn't entirely rational, but it beggars belief the perps didn't think it posed risks, given their gaming on the other side of the table (individually, if not collectively) to assert IPR controls and avoid risks of abuse when asked by the rights agencies in music and video works.
"smart" companies who use lawyers to say "it's ok when your rich, you can do anything, grab any pussy (book)" are not the legal and ethical model we want from corporates are they?