Joint Book Review: Class, by Paul Fussell
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
thepsmiths.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
Social ClassBook ReviewSociology
Key topics
Social Class
Book Review
Sociology
A joint review of Paul Fussell's 'Class' is shared, sparking discussion on social class and its relevance, with commenters debating the book's insights and contemporary applicability.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
5
84-90h
Avg / period
3.7
Comment distribution11 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 11 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 2, 2025 at 5:10 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 6, 2025 at 1:41 AM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 84-90h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 6, 2025 at 4:18 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45455608Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:52:47 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
It's Fussell being humorous, at least in terms of style. His more serious books, "Wartime", and his famous essay "Thank God for the Atom Bomb", have little humor. Fussell was one of the ground troops already in the staging process for the land invasion of Japan, so he's entitled to an opinion on the atomic bombing.
This modernized review of the 1983 book isn't that helpful. That book is a period piece. A more modern book in this genre is "Nickeled and dimed" (1996). That's dated, too, but more recent.
- Top out of sight people are more visible than they used to be.
- Many "middle class" jobs have experienced a "class fall". Teachers, for example, have moved own from middle class to unionized high prole.
- There are fewer unionized high proles. In the 1950 to the 1970s, about a quarter of the US workforce was unionized, and those were the core of the high proles, with good job security, pay, and benefits. They're mostly gone.
- Near the bottom, we have the "precariat": gig workers and people who get laid off a lot.
- The bottom is now the homeless. US homelessness was rare until the 1980s; there were enough crap jobs to go around, and housing was less expensive as a fraction of income. There were more slums, and from the 1960s on, welfare was more generous. Also, drugs were less of a factor; alcohol was bigger.
Class calculator, from Pew: [1]
[1] https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/09/16/are-you-i...
His concept of "luxury beliefs" explains a lot.
He’s not trying to defend his hypothesis at a PhD thesis defense in front of a panel.
It’s more like he’s on the stage at a small TEDx talk. He’s not trying to offer proof for each statement, he’s trying to almost play stand up comedian keeping the crowd engaged.
https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/book-review-fussell-on-clas...
The answer is: very, very bad. Class conflict is so much messier and worse than sectional or ideological or other conflicts. The various social classes of a country are supposed to act together in harmony, and that depends on them seeing each other as part of the same nation.
There are a lot of no-good things that happen when that breaks down. To take one example, the upper classes lose all feeling of noblesse oblige, and come to despise the proles. Because they despise them, they seek to replace them, and use mass immigration to weaken their bargaining power.
Europe, which has a much older and more entrenched system of class conflict than ours, is farther down this path, and clearly heading towards some kind of social dissolution and serious civil unrest."