Is Government Ohs Spending Directly Tied to Workplace Fatality Outcomes?
Key topics
Some quick observations:
More OHS spend per worker often sits next to lower fatality rates, but not always.
Germany and the UK look strong on both spend and outcomes.
Japan has a low fatality rate despite very low direct spend, which suggests other levers at play.
Takeaway: spending helps, but money alone isn’t the silver bullet.
Is it a suprise that Japan wins again?
* Australia 2023: spend \~\$23 per worker, fatality rate \~1.4 per 100k
* Canada 2023: spend \~\$8–9 per worker, fatality rate \~1.6 per 100k
* France 2023: spend \~\$3 per worker, fatality rate \~2.5 per 100k
* Japan 2023: spend < \$1 per worker, fatality rate \~1.4 per 100k
* United States 2023: spend \~\$5 per worker, fatality rate \~3.0 per 100k
* United Kingdom 2023: spend \~\$7 per worker, fatality rate \~0.4 per 100k
* Germany 2023: spend \~\$33 per worker, fatality rate \~0.8 per 100k
* New Zealand 2023: spend \~\$18 per worker, fatality rate \~2.5 per 100k
* South Korea 2023: spend \~\$9 per worker, fatality rate \~5.0 per 100k
Analysis of government OHS spending and workplace fatality rates across several countries.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
No activity data yet
We're still syncing comments from Hacker News.
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Discussion hasn't started yet.