Is Anyone Interested in a Curiosity-Driven"brain Os"core for Ai?(not an Expert)
Key topics
Why this idea? When we compare the human brain and modern PCs, computers actually have much higher memory/storage and calculation speeds per “tick” than the brain’s moment-to-moment thinking. But humans are amazingly creative and flexible with extremely little working memory or raw data. Yet most current AI tries to “stuff” everything inside the model, keep all data/statistics, and just scale up. What if we built a SMALL core that works more like a human “brain OS”:
makes its own questions (“Why?” “What’s weird here?” “What’s interesting?”)
only keeps knowledge as loose indexes (like “I think I heard this somewhere”) and looks up info as needed
links outcomes/decisions with simple feelings or experience (“That felt good/bad/weird/curious”)
works on normal hardware, not just massive clusters
Why do this? I feel that trying to make everything “bigger” misses the key: Human thinking is about curiosity, flexible judgment, and ongoing motivation—not about big memory or giant models. So maybe AI should have a small, motivation-based “core” instead!
Example pseudocode (for illustration):
python class BrainOS: def __init__(self): self.curiosity = 1.0 self.memory_index = {} # Index only self.emotion = 0
def motivate(self):
if self.curiosity > 0.5:
return "Why?"
def recall(self, query):
return self.memory_index.get(query, None)
def learn(self, result, feeling):
self.memory_index[result] = feeling
self.emotion += feeling
(Just to show—I imagine the “core OS” being all about motivation, curiosity, and simple result tracking, not big data.)So…
Has anyone tried to build something like this?
Am I missing obvious research or past attempts?
Is anyone interested in talking or collaborating to try a prototype?
Any advice, feedback, or info welcome!
Thanks for reading—I’m passionate but not technical, so any kind of comments or help are greatly appreciated!
The author proposes a 'brain OS' core for AI that focuses on curiosity-driven learning and simple motivation, rather than large models and data storage, sparking discussion on alternative approaches to AI development.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
5m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
1.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 19, 2025 at 5:28 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 19, 2025 at 5:33 AM EDT
5m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 19, 2025 at 1:05 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
its good
unless someone wanna use it to destroy humans
Would love to hear your thoughts, or anyone else’s ideas!
Making AI run on small machines opens new possibilities for researchers and people who have potato PCs (like me) to run this AI model.
I am really interested, but big companies don't like this stuff for obvious reasons.
Even if the big companies ignore this, I really hope more DIY/open-source AI pops up. If anyone wants to make a tiny prototype or just bounce ideas, I’m totally game!
I’m not a coder, so I can’t build or prototype this myself, but I’d love to brainstorm, discuss concepts, or be involved in the conversation as the idea grows.
Happy to contribute with ideas and feedback if any group wants to take this somewhere—even if it’s just for fun!
send me on discord