In Support of Richard Stallman
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
stallmansupport.orgTechstory
controversialmixed
Debate
80/100
Richard StallmanFree SoftwareCultural Sensitivity
Key topics
Richard Stallman
Free Software
Cultural Sensitivity
The post expresses support for Richard Stallman, sparking a heated debate about his character and the relationship between his personal behavior and his contributions to the tech community.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
31s
Peak period
5
0-1h
Avg / period
2.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM EST
31s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 12, 2025 at 9:02 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45899788Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 1:32:57 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
But he also has tech estimated extraordinarily well, and calls out corporate scams a decade before they try it.
Its possible to ignore his sexist views, at the same time listening to his tech views.
see also the Paradox of Tolerance
So if you have actual evidence of inappropriate things that have been said, especially after someone has indicated it's unwelcome, please share that for everyone to see. Otherwise you're just spouting nonsense with nothing to back it up except arbitrary feelings.
Sorry you didn't want to be approached by Richard Stallman but even people who look like Richard Stallman are allowed to shoot their shot without being called a creep.
The second, mandatory step is to pivot to his work -- and stay there.
The third step (which, regrettably, must be optional) is to consider the relationship between insanity and exceptional innovation/productivity. We've been trying to ignore that one for centuries, but it is responsible for much of what we use and value.
Here's a 1 hour 10 minute long interview where he talks not only about software but also about his personal history with software[1]. Notable to me was the point where he describes the time shortly before and after he started the free software foundation where he came up with the minimum amount of time a year that he had to work in order to pay the bills and still save a bit of money, and he uses the rest for his activism for free software.
He strikes me not as insane, but as someone with great moral clarity and unusual conviction.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucXYWG0vqqk