In Memory of the Christmas Island Shrew
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
news.mongabay.comResearchstory
calmnegative
Debate
60/100
ExtinctionConservationWildlife
Key topics
Extinction
Conservation
Wildlife
The Christmas Island shrew is declared extinct, prompting reflection on the loss of biodiversity and the challenges of conservation, with commenters discussing the implications and potential oversights in species preservation.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
29m
Peak period
7
0-3h
Avg / period
4.2
Comment distribution25 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 25 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 25, 2025 at 4:13 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 25, 2025 at 4:42 PM EDT
29m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
7 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 27, 2025 at 9:49 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45706624Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 7:45:36 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
So 2025 might be the 4th time the shrew has been declared extinct.
It's fascinating.
I always thought my budgerigar weighed nothing at 30grams (about an ounce), but he's not even close.
A word like "extinct" sounds like an absolute, and a rigorous statement would include a detailed disclaimer about the limitations of talking in absolute terms, such as "within the limits of our knowledge, and we could be wrong, yadda yadda."
When talking amongst scientists, those disclaimers are unnecessary because scientific thinking is taken for granted. Thus we talk in abbreviated terms, for instance where "extinct" implies "extinct, with all of the usual disclaimers."
But I think scientists have to remember that this is a habit, and most normal people don't get it. And then our words get filtered through the press. I think an article like this could include a brief working definition of "declared extinct" which would help reinforce the idea that what we sacrifice as the price of scientific knowledge, is absolute knowledge.
Which is to say, the certainty of the Dodo's extinction is related to how long we've not seen one.
Every year that passes then without the shrew will be to underscore its extinction, I suppose. Sad.
I don’t think it is possible to have absolute knowledge of anything. Scientific knowledge is the best (only) thing we have.
[0] https://maps.app.goo.gl/3e55Y1Q3AvMSuccz6?g_st=ic
I wonder how many thought-to-be-extinct species were not seen before it was too late. It's also wild that they were simply released instead of being moved to captivity to try to breed