Ikea's New Smart Home Collection Is Matter-Compatible
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
theverge.comTechstory
skepticalmixed
Debate
40/100
Smart HomeMatter CompatibilityIkea
Key topics
Smart Home
Matter Compatibility
Ikea
IKEA has released a new smart home collection that is Matter-compatible, but commenters express skepticism about the actual benefits and limitations of Matter compatibility.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
4m
Peak period
2
0-1h
Avg / period
1.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 7, 2025 at 6:16 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 7, 2025 at 6:20 PM EST
4m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 7, 2025 at 8:42 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45852441Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 7:57:17 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
As someone who dipped their toe into the water, I’m not excited to go in further or put any trust in this stuff. It all seems very half baked.
Is this a skill issue, or just the nature of the beast that no one likes to admit to, because it’s mostly hobbiests doing this stuff? I wouldn’t expect something being sold to the masses to need special tip and tricks for basic functionality.
My dad is really into the smart home stuff, but he’s retired. He is also endlessly forgiving of what I would call pretty serious issues. For example, the lock on his front door needs to be recalibrated any time someone manually unlocks the door, and he has to wait for a local BT connection to establish any time he wants to do it from his phone. He still thinks it’s cool, but fragility in a door lock system sounds like a nightmare waiting to happen.
Why do they say what some of the sensors (Alpstuga) are, but not others? Do they expect us to remember these non-English words mean, after having seen them once in the article?