If the AI Investment Boom Was Serious, It Would Be Focusing on Electricity
Key topics
The article argues that the current AI investment boom is not serious because it hasn't led to significant investments in increasing electrical grid capacity, a necessary infrastructure to support AI growth, a point echoed by commenters who question the sustainability of current AI investments.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
3m
Peak period
6
0-1h
Avg / period
3.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 22, 2025 at 5:23 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 22, 2025 at 5:26 AM EDT
3m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
6 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 22, 2025 at 8:38 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
It's much easier to do if you don't care about human beings.
Grok's DC has controversial generators.
Amazon, google, microsoft are old school in high energy usage.
china's electrical generation displaced millions of people.
Literally all of the big AI players are actively seeking out electrical abundance.