I Love Reading 1980s Computer Magazines, and So Should You (2021)
Key topics
The nostalgia is real as enthusiasts rave about the charms of 1980s computer magazines, with many sharing fond memories of devouring publications like Byte and Dr. Dobbs. Commenters agree that these vintage mags remain surprisingly relevant today, offering well-written and edited articles that stand the test of time. Some even suggest that old ideas, initially dismissed as failures, are being rediscovered and reappreciated in new contexts. As one enthusiast's collection sprawls "floor to ceiling for several yards," it's clear that these retro tech publications continue to captivate and inspire.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1m
Peak period
5
5-6h
Avg / period
2
Based on 16 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 30, 2025 at 10:26 AM EDT
1m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
5 comments in 5-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 30, 2025 at 11:00 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
As a startup founder back then I got to know a lot of the editors, staff writers and regular columnists at many of the bigger magazines because I'd meet with them regularly during trade shows and editorial visits and sometimes hang out after hours. Outside of a few exceptions like Byte, very early computer pubs were mostly zines written by computer enthusiasts. Due to the success of those early leaders a real publishing industry emerged which attracted writers with journalism degrees (or at least serious writing skills) who also loved tech. A surprising number of them were really insightful about tech trends and where the industry was going. I learned stuff and gained useful perspective that helped me be a better startup guy. While industry scuttlebutt and first-hand stories of Gates, Jobs and Grove could be interesting, I also picked up more subtly valuable things like ways of thinking through evolving tech trends and emerging market analysis.
I got the feeling some of them understood we were living through a revolutionary period that would be historically Important. By the mid and late 90s the tech publishing industry was finally losing the last vestiges of the computer enthusiast era and becoming an IT focused 'Big Industry'. The major magazines were being bought and rolled into New Media conglomerates like IDG and Ziff Davis. Articles were re-imagined as "Content" able to attract page views and ad clicks with web-inflated valuations. At one 90s Comdex, IDG threw a massive party that occupied an entire 15,000 seat sports arena and the top of the arena was lined with 90 six-foot tall blow-ups of magazine covers - one from each of IDG's 90+ IDG tech magazines around the world. The Temptations (I think) performed live and during a break, the founder of IDG was presented with a white stallion horse on stage. I was sitting with an IDG group publisher I'd known since he was the lowly publisher of a pre-IDG backwater magazine. As the white stallion exited the stage, he leaned over to me and whispered "Remember this moment... because it has to be the peak." And he was right. I also fondly recall several 90s Comdex dinners in Vegas with John Dvorak (PC Magazine's long-time top columnist) which often turned into all-night bar crawls. Great guy, good times.
During my PhD, I did some deep literature reviews and found tons of valuable papers that were ignored. I was naive at the time. I'm sorry to say that almost no one cared, and my PhD advisor thought it was a waste of time. I get some appreciative emails every once in a while, but that's it. Many academics seem to implicitly assume that if a paper is older than X years, it's not valuable. I hope that attitude will change within my lifetime.
> Word Search will generate and print the sort of word puzzles where you have to look forwards, backwards and diagonally to Find a given set of words. Even though you can only dis¬ play and solve a puzzle of 32 X 16 on your screen, larger puzzles can be created for printing. To give you an example of what can be done with the program, a set of 10 puzzles including states, mouths and composers are on the disk.
It later goes on to describe something I've personally experienced.
> And printing seems to take a while, but when others sit and fuss over your creation, you’ll say the wail was worth it.
Over the last couple of years I've been working on a side project involving mazes and also... word searches! Last Christmas I printed off a bunch of Christmas themed word searches I generated for the family to play on Christmas day. Seeing real people have real fun with something I created felt like remembering what programming was supposed to be about – bringing actual joy to people, instead of adding another forgettable feature to some product manager's roadmap.
I posted it to HN at the time, but I have a small writeup of it here. https://www.lloydatkinson.net/posts/2024/year-in-review/#-wo...
Show HN: A zoomable, searchable archive of BYTE magazine
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45028002
I'm afraid even https://jonudell.net couldn't save us.