I Am Mark Zuckerberg
Posted2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
iammarkzuckerberg.comOtherstoryHigh profile
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
IdentityNamingOnline Presence
Key topics
Identity
Naming
Online Presence
A lawyer named Mark Zuckerberg created a website to document the challenges of sharing a name with the Facebook CEO, sparking a discussion on the implications of having a common name in the digital age.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
101
0-6h
Avg / period
22.9
Comment distribution160 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 160 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 9, 2025 at 1:13 AM EST
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 9, 2025 at 3:30 AM EST
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
101 comments in 0-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 11, 2025 at 10:35 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45863360Type: storyLast synced: 11/27/2025, 3:36:13 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
"I routinely receive death threats and harassment on the Messenger app directed to the "other" Mark Zuckerberg"
That would be right thing to do.
1) those who inflict harm on others, considering that being wealthy or disliked does not justify actions such as death threats
2) those who target the wrong person simply due to a shared name.
Any discussion of compensation should be directed at them.
In this case that includes the other Zuck's company. He should at least do something about that.
At some point there were teenager girls calling me (no idea how they got the phone number). I started acting like they called the right person and there would be happy screams on the other hand. I guess the high point was that. I decided that might not be a good idea though. Would definitely continue if my “fans” were middle aged men.
For companies that do generally support their customers, usually it gets you into an 'executive support' queue with people who are empowered to understand and solve problems that are mostly solvable --- you should be able to get money things made right, but don't expect product changes (but it can happen).
For companies that don't support their customers, it gets overwhelmed and may get dumped into the same usual support channels where reps aren't empowered to get anything done.
All my chats were gone, and I couldn't write to any of my friends. "Okay, I will just reach the tech support, and solve the problem" - silly me back then. I was genuinely shocked that there was no "Facebook support". Just a bunch of FAQs, general help, and that's it, no way to talk to anyone. I felt completely helpless and lost, really unpleasant feeling.
My account got back to normal after one day or so, but that was the day I decided to begin the process of leaving that platform.
Gmail/Google has the same problem but I suspect and correct me if I'm wrong that it's less surface area to ban you - unless that did happen to people on Google+? But Google+ also didn't have its founder famously tell people "...they 'trust me', dumb fucks"
Me too! Mark S. Zuckerberg seems to be a relaxed guy with a good sense of humor. Very likeable presentation!
Edit: I replied before I read the wikipedia link and learned he literally settled for an xbox.
https://www-heise-de.translate.goog/-55795?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_...
German Original: https://www.heise.de/-55795
I felt guilty reading it, as in many past companies "Mark Zuckerberg" (and Bill Gates, and Tim Apple, Elon Musk etc) was indeed often used as a placeholder for test accounts and test data, and it never crossed my mind that we were basically training ourself to also treat a "Mark Zuckerberg" on our service as an account that escaped the sandbox or some other attack on the service.
Looking back at that period is depressing af.
To defend a bit the choice for somewhat realistic names, there is a gestalt decomposition where you're looking through "First name" first names for hundreds of lines. Same for Lorum ipsums, designers' reaction are completely different when the page looks somewhat realistic and isn't just a blatant test.
Just hand out IDs with an actual unique id number with a check digit to _all_ citizens.
The fraud is a separate issue and SSNs are obviously misused, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not a reasonable system to uniquely identify multiple people with the same name and DOB.
If we colonise the galaxy we could increase that to seven letters.
I believe the civilian should be able to create identities based on their private key (which only the government knows) and these should have different details. Like for example, a nickname, a realname, a telephone number, and address, or multiple of these. But then, also the civilian should be able to revoke the licenses. Or, rather: they should be valid for a short amount of time.
Nice try, so you tell me that the burger hospital I passed by is not in fact a place where they patch up burgers until they’re back on their feet?
A lot of countries have a unique ID for their citizens which is used for routine identification. On websites, at the bank, etc. nothing special about SSNs in this regard, except that they were leaked more times than you can count.
That's not that special either. Plenty of countries make their numbers de jure public information.
The most special thing about the SSN is that the cards say (or said) not for identification, and then they're used for exactly that.
That's the difference. A lot of people and processes in the US make the assumption that the SSN is a well kept secret despite them being publicly leaked so many times. This assumption is a weakness for any process that relies on "secret" SSNs.
I just realised this is probably the German etymological branch of "burgoise".
The divide (or perception of a divide) between city dwellers and the country is not something the US invented, these divisions predate the colonisation of America.
What? Why?
How is a key private if the government (which belongs to the public) can read/edit/use it?
99ad and e128 in this case.
(I highly recommend reading the book, it's one of my favourite novels.)
Ursula Le Guin didn't sugarcoat anarchism, at least, though I still think the depiction of the main planet system is a lot more depressingly plausible.
On second thought, I think the Japanese say "piza", so we're back to a unary sequence now. I call dibs on Papa¹
In unique name world I would totally for a scammer telling me "Hello, my name is Marck Zuckaberg, give me all your data".
Your version of the Purge would make an interesting Stephen King movie.
Ordering the world population by birthday becomes so easy. Plus no endless discussion on wether or not we should use UUID as primary key.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_identification_number...
which superseded the JMBG
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_Master_Citizen_Number
- How can spies have false identities, if you can account for every individual?
- The only scalable way to get voters is not to make people switch to the opposite party, but to flood a country with people who will vote for you.
Given the number is countries that already have those and those that attempt it every few years... I'd say it's not correct.
For spies, you just issue multiple identities - the origin country shouldn't have any issues with that part. It already happened for witness protection level stuff.
For voting... yeah, that's a citation needed. Politicians mostly worry about foreigners coming to vote.
Also, a lot of countries do have IDs...
You get to be Bob192382, because you got in early and only had to add 6 numeric digits. In the year 2100, we're at 15 digits.
A billion (-1) is only 9 digits, even with only one "name" that would likely be sufficient, or 10 maybe digits at the absolute extreme.
See the username efforts of tech companies like Discord, etc.
I suspect when they are old enough to change their names, they will. For example, Wavy Gravy's son changed his name back to a normal family name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavy_Gravy#Personal_life
This is why we can’t have nice things.
[*] trustful, yes, that is a hard nut to crack! Who can be trusted with physical address and for what purpose, but in some sense it may be better for its controlled nature rather than the wild west of postal address world that we live in.
[1] https://ifunny.co/picture/go-gle-most-popular-actor-in-video...
A lot of places (India, Brazil) still use one of your parents on official documents to disambiguate (Bob Smith, son of John (or Jill) Smith from Smithville).
I'm not sure which would be worse.
---
Sorry, an old joke from The Office and I couldn't resits...
Yes, you can. But it’d be stupid.
I'd have to change my email domain too though, so that would suck, but at least I could put up a website there explaining my new name and that I am not the now world famous terrorist who shot up a kindergarden/fondled the pope/ate a baby.
"You're not related to THE Adolf Hitler .. (I hope?)" -hypothetical conversation
[pope fondling - just getting closer to God]
He was also very much like Jim on the show. Fun times.
>Like I said, I don't wish Mark E. Zuckerberg any ill will at all. I hope the best for him, but let me tell you this: I will rule the search for "Mark Zuckerberg bankruptcy". And if he does fall upon difficult financial times, and happens to be in Indiana, I will gladly handle his case in honor of our eponymy.
According to the Algorithm Lords of my particular filter bubble, he does indeed rule the search results for "Mark Zuckerberg bankruptcy".
278 more comments available on Hacker News