How Russian-Funded Fake News Network Aims to Disrupt Election in Europe
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
bbc.comOtherstory
controversialnegative
Debate
80/100
Election InterferenceDisinformationGeopolitics
Key topics
Election Interference
Disinformation
Geopolitics
A BBC investigation uncovered a Russian-funded network aiming to disrupt Moldova's parliamentary election by spreading pro-Russian propaganda, sparking discussion on the role of foreign influence in democratic processes.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
46m
Peak period
3
2-3h
Avg / period
1.6
Comment distribution11 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 11 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 21, 2025 at 4:40 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 21, 2025 at 5:25 AM EDT
46m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 2-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 21, 2025 at 7:04 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45321078Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:23:22 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
It's just stupid.
Similarly calling out American election interference is not "americanophobia" or calling out Israeli or Syrian war crimes and genocides is not "phobia".
Phobias are irrational. With the rich evidence it's called "facts".
Yes, that's russopbobic atrocity propaganda intended to manufacture consent for arming and financing Kiev regime.
> 3,000 Moldovan lei ($170, £125) a month to produce TikTok and Facebook posts in the run-up to the election
> 200 Moldovan lei ($12, £9) an hour in cash to conduct unofficial polling after training on how to subtly sway those being polled
Always wondered how much it took to get people to do this
"Kash Patel, President Donald Trump’s nominee to be FBI director, was paid $25,000 last year by a film company owned by a Russian national who also holds U.S. citizenship and has produced programs promoting “deep state” conspiracy theories and anti-Western views advanced by the Kremlin, according to a financial disclosure form Patel submitted as part of his nomination process and other documents."
Also, influence of money on politics is obviously huge. You can predict the winner based on how much money they have, and the mass media blitzes they do, on a lot of local elections.
Democracy as an idea, I think people need a certain level of media literacy and the media has to be unbiased for people to make good decisions. But then, that was not a thing in the mass media era and that’s clearly not a thing in the social media era.
> and the media has to be unbiased for people to make good decisions
In other words the media holds the power. And we need them to be responsible and not use that power. That’s a fragile system.
- that are favorable to them
- that cause division: extreme, radical or secessionist parties