Hollywood Is Fuming Over a New 'ai Actress'
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
cnn.comTechstory
heatednegative
Debate
80/100
AI in EntertainmentActor ReplacementIndustry Disruption
Key topics
AI in Entertainment
Actor Replacement
Industry Disruption
The introduction of an 'AI actress' has sparked backlash in Hollywood, with concerns over job displacement and creative control, while some commenters debate the technology's potential benefits and limitations.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
39m
Peak period
13
0-3h
Avg / period
4
Comment distribution20 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 20 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 1, 2025 at 10:17 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 1, 2025 at 10:56 AM EDT
39m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
13 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 3, 2025 at 12:28 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45438032Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 2:38:27 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
We know this because the studios have already tried to do this and even Z-list actors expect 6-figure payments for the loss of control of their own image in perpetuity.
Why do people watch movies? Theres a whole lot more going on than just someones image.
I guess studios won't even need to do that, they will crank different versions of movies and A/B test them until perfection, with completely artificial characters, for different audiences.
Who knows if this is that, but this made me realize that pattern is a part of this era.
0: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=u...
I've been on the internet for a while. "u mad bro" is a variation of "u mad" which was coined basically immediately after and used throughout message boards and IRC for years prior to when Google Trends tracks it. Google Trends can be a nice tool, but it's not a primary source of early internet history.
[0] https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=u%20mad&defi...
Supposedly that is why Obama was so demure, he never wanted to be dismissed as just an angry black man. Which is also what made the Anger Translator skit land home.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well
- “Wow … no thanks,”
- “I hope this backfires in every way humanly and well… Non humanly possible.”
- “F*k off.”
I guess this just fits under my general "Horse drivers mad that cars exist" categorization. These tools lower the bar of entry (just like they can lower the bar to entry of programming when used correctly) but I don't quite understand why we need to protect jobs from AI.
Maybe I'm completely out of touch but I look at LLMs and I'm not concerned for job (in tech). Sure, my job will/has changed but it's always changing, I've never understood people who expect to learn a job then never have to learn anything else ever again.
I'll apologize in advance if this sound callous, it's not meant to be that way. Technology comes for everyone/everything eventually, that's life and it's not like we can just stop the forward march of technology. If we do we will become irrelevant on the global stage.
S1m0ne ("Simone", or "Simulation One") https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0258153
> A producer's film is endangered when his star walks off, so he decides to digitally create an actress to substitute for the star, becoming an overnight sensation that everyone thinks is a real person.