Hefesto – ML-Powered Code Quality Agent with Semantic Analysis
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
github.comTechstory
calmneutral
Debate
0/100
Machine LearningCode QualitySemantic Analysis
Key topics
Machine Learning
Code Quality
Semantic Analysis
Hefesto is an ML-powered code quality agent with semantic analysis, but the HN discussion is limited, with only one comment questioning its novelty.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
8m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 21, 2025 at 1:59 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 21, 2025 at 2:07 PM EDT
8m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 21, 2025 at 2:07 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45659187Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 9:09:43 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I built this after getting frustrated with traditional linters (flake8, pylint, etc.) that only catch syntax or style issues, not logical drift. In large Python projects, I noticed we often had multiple implementations of the same business rule — all valid syntactically, but inconsistent logically.
Example: apply_discount() in one file used price * 0.8, while another used price * 0.85 for the same user type. Tests passed, linting passed — yet production behavior diverged. Hefesto was designed to detect exactly this kind of semantic mismatch before commit.
How it works:
Parses your codebase, extracts function-level representations.
Uses sentence-transformers to build semantic embeddings for each function.
Compares them to spot near-duplicates with divergent logic.
Optionally uses an OpenAI model to propose normalized fixes or highlight intent mismatches.
Runs as a FastAPI service or CLI (hefesto analyze --project myapp/) integrated with pre-commit or CI/CD.
I’m especially interested in feedback on:
scaling to large repos (>100K LOC),
balancing false positives vs. meaningful matches,
and whether it makes sense to generalize to TypeScript or Go next.
Repo (MIT): https://github.com/artvepa80/Agents-Hefesto
Happy to answer any technical questions or share benchmarks if people are curious.