Having Fun with Complex Numbers: a Real-Life Journey for Upper Elementary Studen
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
mathwonder.orgResearchstory
supportivepositive
Debate
0/100
Mathematics EducationComplex NumbersElementary Education
Key topics
Mathematics Education
Complex Numbers
Elementary Education
A book redevelops complex number theory from first principles, making it accessible to upper elementary students, and is recommended for curious readers of all ages.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
N/A
Peak period
8
120-132h
Avg / period
4.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 18, 2025 at 5:52 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 18, 2025 at 5:52 PM EST
0s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
8 comments in 120-132h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 24, 2025 at 7:25 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45973364Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 10:53:48 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Even though the book is designed for kids, it is also recommended for curious readers of all ages who want fresh ideas.
https://www.eoas.ubc.ca/courses/atsc113/snow/met_concepts/07...
His other research
had involved discovering the mechanism of ICE CRYSTAL GROWTH HABIT CHANGE, an outstanding problem for more than 50 years in cloud physics that is closely related to the “thousands’ variations” in snowflakes.
https://youtube.com/sehioJvr_eo
Sounds grand. A bit too grand, perhaps. Does anyone know what he's alluding to? ELI am a physicist.
As far as I understand, he essentially defines $i$ through a π/2 rotation. But this is exactly what $i^2=-1$ is. So in a sense, I do not think it is quack, but overblown in terms of novelty. Personally, I always liked such kinds of geometric approach to complex numbers, because it makes a lot of stuff more intuitive, even just for reals (eg you can see multiplication by -1 as rotation by π). If he makes a good dissemination of the complex numbers to kids, it could be worth it, but no idea without any sample from the book.
Then the imaginary unit becomes, not just pi/2 rotation but a "basis vector" for rotation.
Putting on my engineer hat. this identifies rotations with the axis of rotation, which points outside the plane.
The math is not novel but the perspective is.
Now this can be generalized to 3D rotations, whence you think of quaternions as 3 independent axes of rotations.
There's also the "rotational derivative" (angular velocity) bit which is worth thinking about
Is wrong
But an easy way to define the complex plane is to postulate you want multiplication of vectors in polar form to multiply distance to origin and add angles. No mystery number squares going negative here, just simple and useful geometry !
There’s a whole book about it, Visual Complex Numbers by Tristan Needham. This author is the real boss of the game
But I think he doesn't really cover this perspective much (excepting those parts where he hints at hypercomplex numbers)
A series of videos named "Imaginary Numbers are Real" by Welch Labs - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiaHhY2iBX9g6KIvZ_703...
You can buy book versions (used to be free earlier) at - https://www.welchlabs.com/resources