Hardware Inspector Fired for Spotting an Error He Wasn't Trained to Find
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
theregister.comOtherstory
heatednegative
Debate
60/100
Workplace IssuesQuality ControlEmployee Rights
Key topics
Workplace Issues
Quality Control
Employee Rights
A hardware inspector was fired for identifying an error outside his training, sparking debate about workplace accountability, employee empowerment, and the limits of job descriptions.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
52m
Peak period
4
0-2h
Avg / period
2.6
Comment distribution13 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 13 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 28, 2025 at 5:47 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 28, 2025 at 6:39 AM EDT
52m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
4 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 29, 2025 at 11:12 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45403078Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:02:13 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> The pins that were supposed to nestle into the motherboard were instead pointing skyward and it was utterly obvious that no electricity could flow through the part.
> Someone had soldered the chip in place regardless.
How can the chip both be soldered in place and not have any electrical connection? I suppose it could be one of a handful of ICs with both a top and bottom metallic thermal pad, but those are incredibly uncommon.
Others you can bend the pins back to make them fit.
Multiple suggestions in the comments of how this could happen.
>The pins that were supposed to nestle into the motherboard were instead pointing skyward
even mean? How do you physically solder a chip the wrong way around?
The story seems totally unbelievable. This is a training session, someone asks a potentially reasonable question and then is just let go? Hiring people is expensive and letting someone go over something like that is ridiculous.
The story isn't even alleging that the manager disagreed or that the manager tried to argue there was no defect. If you take the story as told it is completely nonsensical.
With effort, and bodge-wire. I've seen chips done dead-bug style when the board's been messed up (eg, the footprint is orientated for the bottom of the board, but placed on the top, and vice-versa).
It's definitely not something you'd ship, but a kludge that can get you working until the next board spin.
So either the chip was glued in place and not soldered or it was soldered and electrical connections were made. Either way, the article is wrong.
Standard operating procedure for a board with a messed up footprint is to glue the chip into place upside down, and then use patch wires to make the correct connections. Obviously you fix this for production boards, but I have personally seen this done for prototype boards.
Training personnel on prototype boards is also very common. It's also very common to do training on non-working boards.
There are well over a hundred comments on the article with people trading war stories of such events they've seen.