Gnu Cross-Tools: Musl-Cross 313.3m
Posted5 months agoActive4 months ago
github.comTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
Musl-CrossCross-CompilationToolchain
Key topics
Musl-Cross
Cross-Compilation
Toolchain
The post discusses musl-cross, a toolchain for cross-compiling with musl libc, and sparks a discussion about alternative toolchains and the naming convention used in the project.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
30m
Peak period
3
4-6h
Avg / period
1.5
Comment distribution17 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 17 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 24, 2025 at 6:20 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 24, 2025 at 6:50 PM EDT
30m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 4-6h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 25, 2025 at 4:33 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45008308Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:48:27 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Out of the glibc tarpit
Why have any glibc? GCC et al. work fine compiled against musl (as proven by ex. Alpine only doing musl). Or is it for running on GNU/Linux systems (can't you statically link the build chain?)?
Maybe they want dns resolution to work properly
In any event, that makes no sense. Pretend for a moment that glibc has working DNS and musl doesn't have working DNS (not true, but let's pretend). You don't build your compiler chain with working DNS support and then use it to build programs without working DNS.
Does this mean useful interfaces like PAM and nsswitch work on musl now?
Or using Zig?
After opening the linked page, I still don't have any idea what the number is in the headline, nor why it's important