Githut – Programming Languages and Github (2014)
Key topics
The GitHut site is making waves with its insightful analysis of programming languages on GitHub, sparking curiosity about the state of coding trends back in 2014. Although the original comments are nowhere to be found, the site itself remains a fascinating snapshot of the GitHub ecosystem at the time. The data likely continues to influence discussions around language popularity and developer preferences, offering a nostalgic glimpse into the past. This retro tech snapshot remains relevant today, as developers and researchers still reference historical data to understand the evolution of coding landscapes.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
10m
Peak period
12
0-1h
Avg / period
3.5
Based on 21 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 20, 2025 at 4:33 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 20, 2025 at 4:43 PM EST
10m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
12 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 20, 2025 at 10:49 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Data analysys without adjusting groups by popularity is a bit lame.
A cursory glance at the source code[1] reveals that it's using GitHub Archive data. Looking through the gharchive data[2], it seems like it was last updated in 2024. So there's 10 years of publicly accessible new data.
Is there any reason we (by "we" I mean "random members of the community" as opposed to the developer of the project) can't re-build GitHut with the new data, seeing as it's open source? It's only processing the repo metadata, meaning it shouldn't even be that much data and should be well under the free 1TB limit in BigQuery (The processed data from 2014 stored in the repo[3] is only 71MB in size, though I assume the 2024 data will be larger), so cost shouldn't be a concern.
I'm not experienced enough to know whether creating an updated version of this would take an afternoon or several weeks.
[1]: https://github.com/littleark/githut/
[2]: https://console.cloud.google.com/bigquery?project=githubarch...
[3]: https://github.com/littleark/githut/blob/master/server/data/...
Source: just left GOOG after 5 years on the GitHub tooling team.
There is also GitHut 2.0: https://madnight.github.io/githut/#/pull_requests/2024/1
This updates through 2024.
https://i.imgur.com/AJBE9so.png
Also, worth noting that it looks like this data only covers 2012-2014?
11 more comments available on Hacker News