From Messy Sources to a Citable Report in an Afternoon. I'm Surprised
Posted5 months ago
anygen.ioOtherstory
excitedpositive
Debate
0/100
Research ReportIndustry AnalysisProductivity
Key topics
Research Report
Industry Analysis
Productivity
User shares a positive experience of creating a citable research report quickly using a tool.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
N/A
Peak period
1
Start
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 19, 2025 at 11:39 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 19, 2025 at 11:39 PM EDT
0s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Start
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 19, 2025 at 11:39 PM EDT
5 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 44958441Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 1:44:47 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
What surprised me: - It nails my taste: clean layout and spacing, with sections that just make sense (overview → market map → key players → trends → risks). - Citation‑first: inline quotes with page numbers and source links — feels trustworthy. - Tiny edits don’t break anything; re‑generating a section keeps citations intact. - The result looks presentation‑ready — I didn’t feel like polishing at all.
Curious if this reads cleaner / more accurate than your typical Gemini/ChatGPT output. What would you change?