Former Capitol Police Officer a Forensic Match for Jan. 6 Pipe Bomber
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
theblaze.comOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
January 6th InsurrectionForensic EvidenceMedia Bias
Key topics
January 6th Insurrection
Forensic Evidence
Media Bias
A former Capitol Police officer is identified as a forensic match for the Jan. 6 pipe bomber, sparking discussion on the reliability of the evidence and media bias in reporting the story.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
23m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 8, 2025 at 11:13 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 8, 2025 at 11:36 AM EST
23m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 8, 2025 at 7:27 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45857706Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 5:57:19 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://adfontesmedia.com/blaze-bias-and-reliability/
The Blaze is joining the not-so-subtle effort to "recast the entire story" and "unravel the carefully crafted, zealously defended Democrat narrative that massive crowds of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol as part of an insurrection to keep Trump in office and deny Joseph R. Biden Jr. the presidency."
The reality of what we witnessed with our own eyes doesn't matter.
This is part of their ongoing "shoot someone on 5th Avenue" moment, their one-trick-pony strategy, to pound on the table, toss a dead cat, and snicker at the rabble they roused into a stupor of regurgitated belief.
They're also recently made a coordinated effort to blacken the BBC for making slanted edits, trying to generate outrage over editorial positions and storytelling techniques, in order to plead their case in the court of public opinion. They got CBS to pay; maybe the BBC will pay too.
But it's all just an insult to our aggregated intelligence.
(Nothing else because interested in the tech, rather than the J6 stuff Tbh)