Europol Said Chatcontrol Doesn't Go Far Enough; They Want to Retain Data Forever
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
old.reddit.comOtherstoryHigh profile
heatednegative
Debate
85/100
EuropolChatcontrolSurveillancePrivacy
Key topics
Europol
Chatcontrol
Surveillance
Privacy
Europol's call for unlimited data retention has sparked controversy, with many criticizing the potential for mass surveillance and erosion of privacy.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
15s
Peak period
133
0-12h
Avg / period
18.3
Comment distribution146 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 146 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 2, 2025 at 6:21 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 2, 2025 at 6:21 AM EDT
15s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
133 comments in 0-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 8, 2025 at 8:32 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45101127Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:39:21 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Every request by law enforcement must be opposed. Do not talk to cops. Do not give them an inch. Ever.
They are insatiable and power-hungry. Nothing will suffice. A police state will still be a million police officers and some stricter laws short.
What if your house get robbed? I'm quite fond of law enforcement actually, and I enjoy living in a safe country.
That's why you just avoid dealing with the police if at all possible.
Is this what you meant by police making you safer from crime?
Actually I think that that's even a fallacy. More data means more stuff to sift through, more false leads in there, more things to follow up. Watch an episode of House M.D. about full-body-scans in medicine: useless, because only wasted time to follow up on every blotch in the scan.
Only publicly available messengers are liable. So if one writes a messenger herself (not too hard) and only distributes it to her friends, family, or a close circle of child porn lovers, one is not liable.
This is how I've been communicating for years now, it works fine and does not feed any of the data parasites out there.
This is not just fiction, it is what I have done and am still in the process of doing, in my case moving from Telegram - I never used nor will I ever use things which requires accounts run by metafacebook or Google or Microsoft or any of the others.
You will only be allowed to install "approved" applications, your device, not your choice anymore.
Tox/aTox [0][1] fits that description and both continue to be developed.
> Empower criminals so that they cant use this excuse to target civilian infra.
According to one webinar from CSIAC (2023) [2], XMPP is popular with Tox slowly catching up.
[0]: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore
[1]: https://github.com/evilcorpltd/aTox
[2]: https://csiac.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CSIAC-Webi...
The EU isn't a democracy, it is actually governed by backroom deals between member states' governments.
Certain state level actors would love some more anti EU sentiments right now.
On the other side, who the hell would pay for pro EU propaganda?
The EU, countries governed by pro-EU governments.
> Certain state level actors would love some more anti EU sentiments right now.
Why? What means do they have to produce it?
And no, whatever the US or the EU do, it is not the same.
No one - the EU gets its money from force: taxes on citizens and fines from companies created in more entrepreneurial environments than the EU can produce.
1% of VAT goes to the EU, yes.
> fines from companies created in more entrepreneurial environments than the EU can produce.
Mostly the ones that have actually been imposed (on GDPR) go to the national governments.
EU is great at creating anti EU sentiments. They don't need foreign actors. Chat Control is just one example.
https://profdenoli.substack.com/p/an-essay-on-eus-dsa-censor...
Now, consider, why should this one be excempt.
Foreign intelligence knows what's there, but local people don't.
And of course the fact that her husband was working for a Pfizer supplier, while she was sending private SMS to the Pfizer CEO, is of course an incredible coincidence.
And also the current NATO Secretary...
"Dutch PM has been deleting text messages daily for years" - https://nltimes.nl/2022/05/18/dutch-pm-deleting-text-message...
Politicians are the new clergy then. You're not wrong.
> All communication in the Government Offices is based on the core values of transparency, factualness and comprehensibility, relevance and topicality. Public access and oversight shall characterise all activities.
> The Government Offices' communication policy covers both internal and external communication.
Sweden is generally pretty good at transparency, both regarding representatives and everyone else. For example, given a full name, you can get a person's address, telephone number, what cars and businesses they own, and even what their salary is, for better and worse :)
Anyway, that has to do with integration issues, not public data so you guys are way off topic.
It's a non-issue though. Americans seem super paranoid about this stuff, and yet when everything is public nothing bad happens.
> Or such a restrictive one.
Err? In what way? Compared to what?
It's a non-issue though. Americans seem super paranoid about this stuff, and yet when everything is public nothing bad happens.
> Or such a restrictive one.
err?
I don't like Chat Control and I believe privacy should be guaranteed, but Europol seems quite relevant in this matter.
Police is supposedly for protecting people's interests, ideally.
Naively, as a citizen I want to be protected from crime and I'm interested in Europol, experts on crime investigation across Europe, getting what they need to do their work and expressing their needs.
Of course I'm also not interested in privacy being thrown away.
Those two things apparently clash, and a healthy debate can help find an acceptable solution.
> Police is supposedly for protecting people's interests, ideally.
Police is supposedly for enforcing the law regardless of whose interests that serve. Making that enforcement easier isn't always a net positive for society, even when the laws themselves are just.
Unfortunately we don't live in an ideal world and I agree with you that in practice, law enforcement isn't always a net positive.
It's its role, theoretically (I don't know about transparent, but protecting citizens for sure).
Of course, the reality is not ideal.
Police may prefer to suppress freedom to achieve its goal, which is crime reduction. Or it may stop caring about difficult or dangerous problems (say, drug dealing cartels), and reorient into harassing the civilian population for petty things, such as policing distasteful memes on the internet.
Unfortunately, I don't have much of this. I wish I could!
Happy you wrote this so I could clarify this point.
We are not talking about power or decision making, we are talking about expression.
I'm really confused as to how some people here misunderstand this discussion as being about giving law-making power to the police.
I'm of course against a police state.
edit: I'm not even defending Europol or what they actually do, there are things they do I most certainly don't like.
This is rule of law 101, and has been figured out hundreds of years ago. Without separation of powers, you cannot have rule of law.
I think any organism should be able to express their needs and voice their concern.
That's of course not the same thing as deciding.
(Note, I'm not vouching for the comment you replied to - EU is not even close/comparable to what peak USSR was)
Clearly it's not even just "for the children" anymore. Just plain old panopticon surveillance. I guess they want their NSA too. Though they forget that NSA is only for terrorism purposes, their data is not too be used for regular policing.
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-l...
"Whatever the government at the time doesn't like", is best described as "opposition". It's a healthy and critical component of a free and fair democracy. One that is increasingly silenced in the modern World, much to our shame when future generations judge us.
While I understand the point behind old line "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter", the key point is that both terrorism and "freedom fighting" are about resorting to the use of violence, and the democracy involved (if it was ever present), has failed when people resort to such violence.
I say this as a man who unfortunately has suffered the fear, paranoia and threat of the Provisional IRA, ISIS-attributed cells, and the hard-right provoking riots in the cities and towns I've lived in from an early age.
And that is the point of terrorism - it is meant to induce fear and paranoia and a sense of threat that makes us all want to do anything to make it go away, including surrendering our fundamental rights and rubber-stamping legislation that gives agencies the right to erase our privacy - and by extension our freedom - that raises the question of what's truly worse?
> that is the point of terrorism - it is meant to induce fear and paranoia and a sense of threat that makes us all want to do anything to make it go away, including surrendering our fundamental rights and rubber-stamping legislation that gives agencies the right to erase our privacy
Are you describing bomb-wearing terrorists here, or the fables of child safety that's being used by people in power to erect a surveillance state before our very eyes?
ISIS-attributed cells conducted attacks with bombs in London and Manchester over many years, starting with the 7/7 attacks on tube lines and bus routes I happen to use sometimes.
On the 22nd March 2017, my partner crossed Westminster Bridge on her way to the theater about 30-45 minutes before an ISIS-affiliated attacker used a car to mow down pedestrians (and because she'd made it to the theater and had her phone off, I wasn't able to contact her for the first hour or so).
A month later (to the day), a suicide bomber detonated a device at a pop concert in my old home city, killing 22 people - many of them children. The bomber had made the bomb while living in an address about 40 feet from my old address when I lived in Manchester. A few weeks after that, another attack happened on London Bridge and Borough Market, on streets and in pubs where I had been socialising the week before.
I was fortunate that I, and those I care about, were not hurt or killed in these incidents. But that was fortune, not skill - a slightly delay here, or a decision to "not go this week, let's go next week", and I would have been in the middle of it all.
And these, I should point out, are not isolated incidents. The full list on Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in... - is quite a thing. It's quite likely that most people living in a major city (or even large town), in the UK today of a similar age to myself (late 40s), will have memories of nearby terrorist attacks in their lifetimes.
Yes, there are fables of child safety at play, and since 2021 the mood has switched so perhaps there is a lesser sense of urgency, but we're now seeing the hard right starting to be responsible for more terrorist attacks and the sense of fear and paranoia is rising again.
Do I like that the price of the Manchester bombings is that the city center is now absolutely drowning in CCTV? No. Do I like that the price of the bridge attacks in London is the huge barriers to protect pedestrians on Westminster, Waterloo and London Bridges? No. Do I like that every time I go into a concert hall or sports venue, I have to have my bags checked and a metal detector is run over me? No. Do I like that there hasn't been a proper rubbish bin in a train station or bus station since the 1980s, lest it is used to place a bomb - as was a favoured technique of the IRA on many occasions? No. I hate all of it.
But would I rather all that, than have to bear the misery of more actual deaths of innocent civilians? Yes.
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/uk-spy-base-g...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
In terms of e2e chat encryption, binary blobs and 'managed' mobile platforms render it somewhat of a moot point to me. Bad actors can either be 0day'd or Social Engineered for those with advanced OpSec. To date though, the most successful network was Encrochat - an OTR-based messaging app which routed conversations through a central server based in France, which was eventually compromised by French police with a malware allowed them to read messages before they were sent and record lock screen passwords
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncroChat
Europol got a taste for the heady power of it - The chief of the Dutch National Police Force, Jannine van den Berg , compared the malware to "sitting at the table where criminals were chatting among themselves".
Now the reality is that the equivalent of the Clipper Chip 'key escrow' is now implementable at a Firmware/Mandatory Push Update level, and probably as part of a 'secure' walled garden app-store API in future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip
Yep thats def true, thats 100% the real reason and only purpose of the largest domestic agency
I'm sure they do their geopolitical manipulation like when echelon was used to get a one over on airbus.
But the NSA wouldn't provide evidence in criminal prosecutions but europol is all about that.
To me, the US have way to much influence, and it's destroying us.
Its NGOs would never have qualified as NGO here (Thorn is only an example), yet we let them lobby as if they weren't weird, dark money adjacent groups. Worst, the Atlas network and all its foundations/schools are definitely culturally USian, yet they try (and succeed) in redefining Europe culture (the 'please think about the children' is definitely from there) and importing US culture wars we never cared about until the late 2000s. Europe and the EU is slowly turning into the US, our governments allow it, and I think that we should pump the brakes, fast.
I like the US, I like people there, but I don't want my country to become a satellite of the US.
One of my favorite random topic discussion places was /r/hungary, my country of origin's subreddit. In 2015, at the height of immigration "crisis", we had very good discussions about the whole topic, even when most Hungarians were, and are clearly racists, and we had very differing views. We discussed pros and cons, we pushed statistics here and there. And we weren't assholes with each others. Even when we were at different places on the political spectrum. And generally every topic could be discussed, without real retorsion.
In 2018, the number of people who has only faith and nothing else increased. That was the first time when, it started to bug me.
In 2020, the number of fake information about COVID, was already about 50-50 with real information. Simple facts which were against their faith were tolerated rarely. For some reason, I still thought that it's just an ephemeral thing, because they're afraid. I was wrong. Oh god, I was very-very wrong. For most people, this was the trigger to go into full unsubstantiated conspiracy theory field.
In 2022, the sub clearly started to be controlled by political parties. There were several obviously paid accounts by several parties.
Nowadays, it's fully controlled by a political party. Dissenting views are barely tolerated. And basically all views are based on faith, and faith alone. There is no - not just sensible, but simply - discussions anymore. Whoever wants to discuss Hungarian affairs sensibly, long left that place.
I've seen the same thing regarding my friends, and people who I followed on Twitter. Most of us just left public spaces all together. We don't follow news anymore that closely either. And who do, slowly go into a very dark place. One of my friends started with "classical liberalism". Nowadays, outspoken Nazi. One other was afraid of COVID, and started to share bullshit D-Vitamin spam blog posts. Nowadays, he's full blown antivax. Another, was deep into depression, after the amount of alt-right bullshit he consumed. Luckily, he got out from there, but there were times when I thought that I lost him. My mom doesn't know what's happening in the country where she lives. My dad knows, follows the news, and he's halfway into depression for the past years. And there are those people who I followed on Twitter, because they argued sensibly. They are either not there anymore, or slowly their fact based opinions were replaced by faith. They maybe still on the "right" "side", but it's more rarely a conscious decision. It's only a matter of time before they will slip, and even now sensible discussions are impossible with them.
I don't know what good solutions there are. I hate that I'm turning more, and more inwards, creating a bubble again, after I forcefully cut it open completely about 15 years ago. But unfortunately, it's worth less and less to read random people's opinion... or at least what many try to sell as opinion.
These are words from people who have a seat at the table in negotiating this attempt at getting chat control through. If they don’t manage it this time, don’t be surprised if the things described are in the next try, and then people will be looking for something else to call sensationalised.
And the name was known but redacted before releasing the information to the journalists
The meeting in which it was said involved the europol executive director at the time
It's nothing more one of the examples of EU bureaucrats trying to justify their inflated EU salaries. It is mostly coordination paperwork that inflates Brussels chaos without direct crime fighting effectiveness.
Should be closed as each country police already cooperates as needed. They are nothing more than a support only EU agency requesting bigger scopes to justify their existence.
They can't by law apply coercive measures today, and its staff cannot execute investigative measures today.
There are ample evidence of EU expanding authority beyond the original charter, from common market project into a political union with broad competences.
Right, EU will probably look like USA after 100-200 years, but it takes time to get there, and likely will take a civil war where they decide that member states are not allowed to leave the union like what happened in USA.
This is supposed to change with the ProtectEU plan. Europol would become an FBI equivalent.
Chat Control and whatever is following from that is just the beginning.
I liked it that it explains what Chat Control is, what is the current position of different countries and politicians, and suggests ways to contact your representatives to explain why you have one position or the other.
And then you compare this. Let's say you do get scammed into transferring money. Can Europol, or any police department, help you? No ...
Think of the children!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/03/05/encrypt...
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39609846)
Can start a discussion here without reddit threads of random article screenshots.
They have another interesting article: https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the...
Follow the money also has a few articles about... Well, money and thorn and eu csam regulation
8 more comments available on Hacker News