Electrolysis Can Solve One of Our Biggest Contamination Problems
Key topics
A groundbreaking electrolysis technique is turning heads by potentially tackling one of the world's most pressing contamination issues: dehalogenizing toxins and repurposing their carbon "skeletons" into valuable industrial chemicals. While some commenters are thrilled about the prospect, others are raising practical concerns, such as the method's cost-effectiveness and the challenge of "cleaning" soil versus simply containing or removing it. The discussion reveals a divide between those who see the technology as a game-changer for on-site remediation and those who question its scalability and feasibility, with some suggesting it might be better suited for integration into industrial processes. As the conversation unfolds, it becomes clear that the true value of this innovation lies in its potential to transform the way we handle toxic waste.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
16
0-3h
Avg / period
5.5
Based on 61 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Dec 30, 2025 at 1:08 PM EST
10 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Dec 30, 2025 at 2:10 PM EST
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
16 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Jan 1, 2026 at 2:20 AM EST
8 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> The reactor used by the researchers consists of an undivided electrolysis cell in which dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is used as a solvent
They remove the DDT from the soil into the solvent (itself quite unpleasant). From there, it's pretty easy to filter out the soil and clean it up. Add water and boil or freeze dry to extract it back out, preferably capturing it to be reused.
"Cleaning" soil is an interesting concept. At what point does it just become dirt? Presumably some of the nutrients will remain, but it seems like this would sterilize it.
Considering the existing DDT contamination, ending up with dirt that needs to be fortified with compost is hardly the worst trade-off.
I would definitely bet against this if I could. Soil is far more potent than DDT can harm.
DDT, like organic mercury compounds, bioaccumulates up the food chain. Contaminated soil is sequestered to prevent it from contaminating insects and animals and then humans.
Hence, the trade-off: DDT in the ecosystem, or killing soil and rebuilding it with compost and time.
Rather, it is a more permanent solution compared to sequestration, where the benzene production offsets the cost.
If, as they plan, it can be done on-site, that would also eliminate transporting the soil and avoiding accidentally spreading it elsewhere, which is appealing as well.
Sanitary landfills (the sort that prevent seepage) are not exactly cheap either, and pose an ongoing risk in that the DDT is always there, waiting to get back out.
Certainly what comes out of the machine will not be living.
It sounds like it could be used to decontaminate a waste stream, but how do you select out the offending materials from a site?? What magic breaks halogenated bonds while leaving others (which are easier to break) alone? And how does the solvent work?? Remember, teflon only became practical when they found a solvent for it--and it's the solvent that's the real problem. Teflon is non-reactive enough for the body to pretty much ignore, the solvent (which of course isn't 100% removed from the final product) has one reactive spot and is a problem. They've tried to hide behind a game of musical chairs, using "different" solvents, but the dangerous part of the molecule is unchanged as that's what's needed to do it's job. A longer or shorter inert tail makes it "different" from a legal standpoint, not meaningfully different from a toxicity standpoint.
Why am I thinking scam?
Take a bunch of contaminated soil, wash with DMSO, filter out soil, wash again, take all of that and electrolyze it.
Take the soil, dilute with lots of water and boil in a chamber with a fractionating column / distillation setup to reclaim the last of the DMSO.
I'd be surprised if this was in any way economical, but it's the cheapest way to permanently get rid of DDT, and the production of benzene and other hydrocarbons is a nice side benefit to reclaim some of the cost.
I've only ever personally used DMSO in chemistry labs, but Wikipedia [0] makes it look pretty safe: it claims that it has a higher LD50 than ethanol and that it's been FDA approved for human usage, so I wouldn't call it nasty. Now, I wouldn't really want to drink it because the side effects and taste sound pretty unpleasant, but it appears that it would be safe to do so.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide#Toxicity
At the scale of "washing tons of soil to remove DDT" it'd be quite unfortunate if something went wrong and tons of DDT tainted DMSO got dumped into the wild.
It seems scam adjacent because a high proportion of other stuff written in the same tone by the same types of people is a scam. The researchers don't write these puff pieces generally and the people that do spend the rest of their day writing "not technically a lie" type inflated corporate newspeak puffery that are basically "we're actually doing the customer a factor by charging more for less" tier lies.
It's also not unlikely that the experts involved provided a list of possible use cases and "making benzene from 3rd world dirt" was way down it and they had no idea the writer would lead with it.
There's a soil remediation project near my workplace (former railway depot). They've dug up several meters deep by now.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254251962...
More narrowly, Paul Stamets has worked a lot on mycroremediation — remediating with fungi.
…who is this?
So... he invented the ocean?
In practice, there are multiple vats. The first stage has algae growing, which sequesters the heavy metals. The next stages follow other kinds of ecosystems, such as organisms from swamps. He will mix samples from multiple ecosystems that normally don’t mix so that some kind of self-organizing ecosystem can form.
Then it is measuring and monitoring the contaminants. With the superfund site, he was tracking presence of the top ten pollutants on the EPA list. However, he also shows how people can use much simpler, non-industrial tests — using samples from say, uncontaminated lake water nearby and use a microscope to see if the water being treated will kill those microorganisms. This allows for remediation to be executed by people who don’t have access to labs, but still need a way to test their water.
A much simpler version of this that follows the same design principles is capable of local, onsite treatment of ordinary black water.
Consider if organism A consumes organism B in a symbiotic way. E.g., organism B makes berries.
Then, we engineer A to seek out and consume DDT, perhaps by making DDT delicious or fragrant to A.
Unexpected consequence: organism B evolves to produce berries that are absolutely redolent with DDT.
This might happen centuries later, due to the DDT-phillic genes outlasting the presence of artificial DDT in the environment, or it could happen much sooner, or it might never happen. Hard to know. “Life finds a way.”
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/gama/do...
There was an old lady who swallowed a fly, she didn’t know why.
I'm having trouble finding the paper, can you link please?
https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/chab/organ...
I can't find the 2025 which this article is supposed to be improving upon that work?
Or are we just resurfacing 2021 work all together?
> The reactor used by the researchers consists of an undivided electrolysis cell in which dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is used as a solvent
They move the DDT from the soil to the solvent, which is the medium for electrolysis, not the soil itself.
Emphasis added
The problem has been that the DDT isn't really useful, so you're still left over with DDT tainted DMSO. Hence, most cleanup efforts focus on sequestration of soil.
The electrolysis step creates benzene and other hydrocarbons, making a useful byproduct. This means there's a better incentive to treat it rather than store it.
https://genius.com/Dead-kennedys-dmso-lyrics
I’m not sure what happens when you mix it with LSD. Again, try it and see.
After applying the ointment I got an upset stomach in minutes so yeah…. It was well absorbed.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3141840/
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/drugs/21230-diclofenac...
You could get DMSO and ketamine at the vet supply store back then in the 80s. I heard of people investing acid via DMSO in that time frame, but it could have been an urban legend. It was a horse area and DMSO was used with horses to get stuff deep into their legs or something like that.
Copying my comment on another subthread [0] here:
I've only ever personally used DMSO in chemistry labs, but Wikipedia [1] makes it look pretty safe: it claims that it has a higher LD50 than ethanol and that it's been FDA approved for human usage, so I wouldn't call it nasty. Now, I wouldn't really want to drink it because the side effects and taste sound pretty unpleasant, but it appears that it would be safe to do so.
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46442253
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide#Toxicity
But yea, I overrated it's nastiness.
What's particularly interesting is the potential for on-site remediation. Traditional methods often involve excavating contaminated soil or pumping and treating groundwater indefinitely. If this can be scaled cost-effectively, it could transform cleanup efforts at industrial sites and military bases.
The key question is economic viability at scale. Energy costs for electrolysis can be significant, and PFAS contamination is often widespread. Would be curious to see lifecycle analysis comparing this to current remediation methods.
Technically it solves contamination problems too.
1 more comments available on Hacker News