Dismissing Something Just Because Is AI Generated Is Not Critical Thinking
Key topics
The logic seems to be: AI was used to make this, so it's automatically garbage. This is also true for code by the way.
Not gonna lie, I also found myself doing this sort of discrimination in my head.
The problem is the following: this is a bias. Just because AI was used to make something, that something is not automatically invalid.
I understand where the bias comes from, a lot of this AI generated content is extremely lazy and boring. But that's not a valid arguments to disregard something just because our AI radar is triggered. A lot of people, me included, uses AI to correct grammar and improve syntax. And why wouldn't we?
I think avoiding this bias is important because focusing on style instead of content is exactly what we shouldn't be doing in this time and age. We should pay even more attention to the actual meaning of what is written since AI can be very persuasive at making faulty arguments and forging facts.
Em dashes are not a valid reason to shut off your critical thinking.
The author argues that dismissing content solely because it's AI-generated is a bias that hinders critical thinking, and HN commenters largely agree, highlighting the importance of evaluating content based on its merit rather than its origin.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
11m
Peak period
4
0-1h
Avg / period
4
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 13, 2025 at 3:41 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 13, 2025 at 3:52 PM EDT
11m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
4 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 13, 2025 at 4:05 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Limiting even my scantest attention (let alone critical thinking) via extremely simplistic - but fast - criteria is an inescapable physical reality.
I'm fine with using that heuristic, personally. There isn't enough time in the day to critically analyze everything I come across, so a quick way of making a "first cut" is a good thing, even if it means sometimes discarding some wheat hiding in the chaff.
Just an aside, but most LLMs can actually do a pretty decent job cleaning up your sentences/paragraphs WITHOUT substantially rewriting them (such that they sport the signature AI varnish) - but you have to deliberately instruct them not to. LLMs are almost always overly eager and it can sometimes take a bit of prompting to keep them on a short leash.
This is what I use: